If by taking over the conversation you mean giving my own thoughts, then I am as guilty as you are. No one of forcing you to respond.
zbyte64
I'm not some bot where asking "kindly" will garner a sycophantic agreement. You are talking to people who can make their own value calls in regards to meaningful context, unlike a bot. But the important thing is that you didn't disagree with what I said, and like you I care about being perceived as correct on this matter.
This isn't about you being correct, if that was the case you would focus on your argument instead of giving an empty retort. I suspect this is your attempt to control the conversation. What is your intention with letting us know your motivation is to be perceived as being correct?
The pinkertons have entered the chat
Don't worry, the America's free market provides many paramilitary groups to shutdown those pesky unions and curious journalists. No need for government involvement!
We tried to have navy seals plant listening devices in North Korea ahead of a summit, it did not go well. People say nukes, but I think their security is a whole nother level, like our government rarely knows where those leaders are at a given moment.
And he encouraged others to do so. It is almost like this is a bigger issue for women or girls for some reason. I'm probably sexist for noticing.
Also fun: calling in and you are told your healthcare was canceled, you ask why only to be told that is confidential. Good times.
People become more tribal under scarcity conditions and the scarcity is largely artificial.
The United States has negotiated "Pax Silica" so that it doesn't need Taiwan for chips....
I guess they would just kidnap, I mean "capture", the president of Taiwan to be charged in their courts. No need to invade, it's just "law enforcement" without a warrant like what Trump is doing now.
She will say this is the war to end all wars or some BS like that. Words mean nothing to these people.
Why do you need to imagine what you claim is already happening?