Yes, called chromium, I've had to use chrome sometimes for work (fucking teams) so instead I use chromium.
yyprum
joined 5 months ago
Enjoying a movie, having fun watching it, is not an indication of its quality. It is acceptable to enjoy bad movies, nothing wrong with that, I've watched plenty of movies I consider as bad but still had fun and a nice time watching them.
Defining the quality of a movie by the enjoyment you had is like defining the quality of a painting by how realistic it is. A painting might be good even if it is surreal, unrealistic or abstract, and a realistic painting might be crap, so the quality of the painting is not tied to simply how realistic it is. The same way there are movies that are fun and enjoyable but not "good", and there are movies that bore most people and are a master piece.
While with a painting defining the quality is simpler (simpler yes, but not simple) as it is the creation of one person normally, for movies it gets incredibly complex as there's so much to measure and its the work of so many people; the script, the acting, the photography, the score, the directing, the stunts, makeup and dressing, FX, ... There's a lot that can be good and a lot that can be bad in the same movie.
At least that has always been my perspective, I have no issues admitting to not liking something despite how good it was, and loving something that I knew was not good. Some examples that come to mind: I love the matrix movies, love watching them, yes, in plural, that doesn't mean the second and third are good. It feels like there were too many issues in them to make them good, but I still had a good time watching them. On the other hand, I feel like a movie like 2001 is of unquestionable quality, yet I always feel somewhat bored watching it and would rather do something else.
Nah, it's greed that will do that. Apathy is just a symptom for people that feel like they can't do anything against the greediest bastards. And it's also pushed as a control system to be able to get even more by those.
When being from the lgbtq community means that you are persecuted, punished and your life is threatened, doesn't it mean it is political? why do you say it is not political? Or is that about fighting for survival? Is fighting for survival political? Does it even matter? You don't specify it in your comment, are you supporting the other comments that because it is political companies should stay away from it?
When laws and states and governments try to push too far to limit things such as gender identities the lives of many become political as they are threatened by the laws, states, and governments. And yet, the rights and survival of people in peace is not truly political. That's just the excuse used to try and censor the discussion of such topics.
Pride movement is as political as Christmas is political. There will be people that make it a political issue, but that doesn't mean it is actually political. A company that celebrates a holiday that big part of the population celebrate is not siding with a political party or even with a religion. The rights for any minorities in a government or a state is political, but pride is a celebration and as such it is not political. A state making a religion official and forced/encouraged is political. Celebrating Christmas is not political. And celebrating Christmas as a company doesn't mean they alienate customers or employees that don't actually follow the religious side of the holiday.
Don't get sucked into the idea that a company cannot show support for minorities or make events depending on the celebrations socially occurring because you need to be neutral. That's not neutrality, that's self censorship.
To take it to the extremes, are we expecting companies to say they are not against slavery but also not in favor, because it is political? Child labour is bad, but I don't want to support any side because it is too political. Terrorism attacks? Well we don't have a stance against or for them, it's just too political.
There's a big difference between siding with one party or another and not showing a stance into what should be universal human rights. Are universal human rights political? Well kinda, but we shouldn't support, or allow any company that is afraid of supporting human rights because it might alienate some customers... Pride and lgbtq rights might not be on the same level as slavery, terrorism and child labor but hell who someone spends their life with is a human right and has nothing to do with politics.
You have written your comment beautifully. That's it, that's all I wanted to tell you.
Signed, a new follower of your Authoritarian Left term, and another durable ally.
Precisely, just make it optional, hell even just apply the way it is now as default, but give the option to those that prefer it. But each time it is requested it gets shot down immediately and when people ask why not make it optional no one answers.
The needed change is not even that complex and someone provided the link to the pull request for radarr that implemented the similar function (actually even more complex as it has more options for movies). I've even considered trying to do it myself, but its quite the effort to prepare the dev environment, make the change, test it and make the pull request just to get the same dev shoot it down just out of spite. If the feature request was still open even if the usual devs don't want to do it then it would show that they would accept it...
The main devs are rejecting the feature with really bad excuses. Basically, it comes down to two reasons:
- if you get those lnk files and what ever, then you are using a bad tracker and you need to do better.
- episodes are often released early and with such a setting you would miss out on them. The thing is I don't care about early releases, but when a show arrives officially.
I went down the rabbit hole on this the other day as I was trying to find a way to block unreleased episodes. It's unbelievable to me the resistance they put against such a simple feature. Like no one is requesting to force it that way, just give the option to make it so.
The two reasons I saw for canceling the feature request over menu duplicates is the "use better trackers" mainly but also that shows are so often released or leak early they this setting would block you from getting them faster... Those are the dumbest reasons ever to not provide a setting that people are literally asking over and over again for.
The change is done for radarr so it might not be terribly hard to adapt into sonarr. Being open source I would have expected someone to do the change already but if they fight against it so much as a principle who would expect them to approve the change..
And... Why not both? (:
If they don't do this we'd not know it doesn't change ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That may be what you want but that's not what stop killing games is about. You can't ask for the life plan of some software because companies will simply say that they plan to keep it up forever and then later say "we can't keep it up anymore! Too expensive! We go bankrupt uwu"
You can't demand either from them that they upkeep a game fo as long as players exist.
The initiative is about making companies guarantee that if (when?) the games EOL arrives, then they release whatever resources are needed for players to continue using what they have paid for.