yetAnotherUser

joined 2 years ago
[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

the people who killed Jesus

This is clear-cut Christian antisemitism, the justification for more than a millenia of discrimination and ultimately culminating in the Holocaust. You are implying present day Jews have the collective responsibility of killing Jesus.

Also, you are equating Judaism with Israel, which is done by both zionists and antisemites.

are trying to destroy his homeland and take it over

Palestine the country is not Palestine the region. Israel has control over large parts of Palestine, the region. Palestine, the country, does not. Jesus lived in Palestine, the region. Jesus did not live in Palestine, the country or modern-day Israel, the country. His "homelands" have not existed for nearly two millenia since they have been taken over countless of times, be it the British, the Ottomans, the Crusaders and everyone before that.

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't look into any details if you want to keep that opinion

Any details

  • Only adults may consume and/or own cannabis
  • No buying, selling or giving away weed
  • Only consuming cannabis you or your Cannabis Social Club (CSC), should you join one, grew is allowed. In a CSC cannabis may be grown and sold to its members
  • CSCs may not make profits
  • No more than 50 (30 if you are younger than 21) grams of cannabis per month may be handed out to you by your CSC
  • No cannabis with more than 10% THC may be handed out to people younger than 21
  • Consuming cannabis within 100 meters (visual range) of a playground, school, youth center, public sports facilities or CSCs is prohibited
  • Consuming cannabis between 7am and 8pm in a pedestrian zone is prohibited
  • Consuming cannabis "close" to minors is prohibited
  • No CSC may be established within 200 meters of a school or playground
  • max 500 members per CSC
  • no more than 1 CSC per 6000 city residents (or 1 CSC if the city/town has less than 6000 residents)
  • no extracting THC from cannabis
  • no owning more than 3 cannabis plants
  • no owning more than 50 grams of dried cannabis, including plants
  • no carrying around more than 25 grams of dried cannabis, including plants
  • CSCs have to keep meticulous records about their members, who received when how much cannabis and how much cannabis grew in total
  • police can just go and take these records without requiring a judge's approval
  • for the coming months: no driving a car or bicycle with more than 1 ng of THC in your blood or you will lose your car driver's license and pay a fine (yes, even if you're caught riding your bicycle, you will lose your car driver's license). Fun fact: the police announced they will significantly increase controls
[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's an easy solution to make bridges stable in windy conditions:

(That bridge was built from 1846 to 1851 and it's still used today)

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 124 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Which sub are you talking about, there are quite a few in this community

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since when is it in June? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Men's_Day says it's on November 19th.

Are there two international men's days or why is there a spike in June?

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're right.

But I'm a little optimistic. The image being widely used for decades is a symptom, not the cause of women being unwelcome.

With it being finally banned, it seems like this is changing. Hopefully this means the root cause, misogyny in tech, is at an all time low.

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doch, ich glaube aber ChatGPT interpretiert das Zitat als gegen das Genderverbot. Die Aussage "ist ein klares Signal" ist ja nicht unbedingt befürwortend. Hier meine Interaktion mit ChatGPT:

Ich:

Überprüfe diese Aussage eines Politikers bezüglich Grammatik und logischer Konsistenz. Der Politiker spricht sich für das Verbot aus.

"Das Gendern-Verbot in Hessen ist ein klares Signal. Wir wollen keine Sprachpolizei!"

ChatGPT:

Grammatikalisch ist die Aussage korrekt. Inhaltlich könnte sie jedoch als inkonsistent betrachtet werden, da das Verbot des Genderns als Maßnahme zur Regulierung der Sprache selbst als eine Form von sprachpolizeilicher Intervention interpretiert werden könnte.

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Und am Tag der Deutschen Einheit verbieten wir im Gedenken an die religiöse Repression der DDR den Kirchenbesuch? Ich bin mir sicher jeder Christ wäre davon begeistert.

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think 3 billionaires emit in their combined lifetime as much as 100 BILLION farting chicken in a day.

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oder einfach:

Sehr geehrte Student[ZENSIERT]innen

Ist ja eindeutig nicht gegendert

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Depends on the language, though they'll probably pronounce it in a way disregarding every language with ö's rules.

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would billionaire "Muslims" from the Middle East give a fuck about Muslims in the US?

view more: ‹ prev next ›