yetAnotherUser

This is the GutHub project by the way:

https://github.com/anarchivist/worldcat

Clearly, a project whose last commit was 12 years ago should be more than enough evidence that she hacked WorldCat.

Yeah sure, Trump will surely be controlled

Just like Franz von Papen ensured Hitler could be easily controlled once Hitler was in a position of power:

"In two months, we will have pushed Hitler so far into a corner, he squeaks!"

• January, 1933

You're right, I don't have that on my keyboard though

Besides, a ∈ A ⊆ B => a ∈ B, so what I wrote is not THAT nonsensical

In Germany red light cameras take two pictures shortly apart to determine whether you just stopped too late or ran the light.

What's a footjøb, is it something like a Danish variant?

Shouting "I'm going to kill the president of the United States" in front of the White House will not lead to you being arrested, provided you have zero intention to pull through with it? It is nothing but speech after all.

False, the '=' is transitive, meaning:

A = B and B = C implies A = C

The symbol you meant to use is the implication arrow: =>

Trans women => women

Cis women => women

Black women => women

Lesbian women => women

This means: If the left statement is true, the right statement must also be true. If the left statement is false, you don't know whether the right statement is true or false.

Killing 50% of any one people is genocide, right? For example, the Nazis killed up to 50% of European Romani people and it is classified as a genocide.

Let's assume killing 50% of n peoples is genocide.

Since killing 50% of n peoples is genocide, killing 50% of n+1 peoples must also be genocide, else a number N would exist such that killing 50% of N - 1 peoples is genocide but killing 50% of N peoples is not. The existence of such a number N would be quite contradictory, as it would imply one could undo genocide by killing more people. Additionally, if one were to first kill 50% of N - 1 people and then kill 50% of one more people some time later, both events would be classified as genocide, since killing 50% of one people is assumed to be genocide.

Therefore, Thanos did in fact commit genocide.

Maybe they're werewolves

Hm, ich bin beinahe zwiegespalten.

Homöopathie ist nichts als massenhafter Betrug, der von den Nazis stark gefördert wurde.

Wenn die BW Grünen aber gegen Homöopathie vorgehen wird die BW CDU wahrscheinlich 40% der Stimmen bekommen und alles wird nur noch schlimmer hier in BW. Die Grünen sind ja schon so schwarz wie möglich, ich möchte nicht, dass die CDU noch mehr Einfluss bekommt.

Ok, der Teppich sieht aber viel besser aus, als der, den ich als Kind hatte, ich bin beinahe neidisch.

Ich meine - da ist sogar eine Ritterburg drauf

I don't quite understand the point you're trying to make. I responded to a comment stating:

"The JEWS™ are destroying Jesus's homelands just like they killed him, why is any Christian supporting the Jews™???"

Additionally, the comment conflates Palestine (region) with Palestine (country). Israel is currently destroying and invading Palestine (country). Israel has controlled large parts of Palestine (region) for many decades and has ethnically cleansed those parts of many non-Jewish Palestinians (region) who have mostly fled into neighboring countries, including Palestine (country).

What I'm trying to say is: It's a contradiction to argue Israel is destroying Jesus's homelands because Israel has controlled large parts of Palestine (region) for 80 years. They would've either destroyed his homelands already or they wouldn't have. If it's the former, Israel cannot destroy "Jesus's homelands" anymore. If it's the latter, you're implying that the current borders of Palestine (country) is "Jesus's homelands" - which is false, as Palestine (country) only controls a portion of Palestine (region).