wuphysics87

As if acting in one's own self interest in that way is analogous.

Most people have had great answers coming from the company side of things. I'll take it from the standpoint of individuals like us helping someone linux curious see the light, while still having the "just works" experience.

Do not give them any choices. None. Put them on your stable distro of choice for a new user, call whatever that is "Linux", and be on your way.

But why? Isn't that antithetical to everything we value? Yes and no. We value choice almost above anything else, but that doesn't "just work" for most people. Which of those do you value more?

This was a lot of what I was getting at. We artificially build our own walled garden. We'll let anyone in just as much as we'll throw turds over the fence. Your shit don't stink if you throw it at someone else

Get yourself a good therapist. It is their job to help you answer these kinds of questions yourself.

Too humane

The generic advice is diversify and invest in the riskiest options you can stomach when you are young. For me, that means low cap index funds.

The arch wiki is difficult to use for beginners. Each page is single topic. It is not a guide. Using it daily, it takes at least a month to understand it well enough to "build your own guides". If you want to do that kind of deep dive, jump on in. If not, you'll have a better time using just about any distro other than arch.

BTW. If you do decide to take that route. Don't become one of those miscreants who "uses arch btw" It's a red flag for someone who doesn't know wtf they are talking about.

Could you share that script with op?

I did something similar with 4 15 year old optiplexes for a student lab. IT wasn't happy until the saw how well they ran

Block them and move on. Half of scamming is getting money. The other half is trolling by wasting the target's time.

I get it though. These assholes piss everyone off. Wanna counter them? Get really good at a hobby. Fall in love. Make a fuck ton of money. Etc.

Wasting even a moment of your time on these pieces of shit is time you aren't doing the above. Don't let them take from you that which you owe yourself

It's something we'll take for granted. With enough time and experience, you could fire off a one liner to fix a problem in less than a minute. For most people thst could take an hour, and they'd probably give up within 10 minutes

IMO it is a matter of who wants to use said copyrighted material, for what purpose, and to what end. And not necessarily over some period of time. Two licenses I use.

GNU Public License version 3, GPLv3. Strong copyleft. The right to copy is left to the end user. You can do whatever the hell you want with the code provided you pay forward the four basic freedoms granted to you under the license. I.e. You can view the source code, you can modify the source code, you can distribute the source code, and you can distribute your modifications.

If you do not pay forward the four basic freedoms, you are in violation of the license. This is why google, microsoft, etc. WILL NOT use gplv3 code. They will never grant the four freedoms downstream, and they don't need the legal liability. They have code scanners that look for gplv3 code, and as a developer you use it, they will fire you on the spot. Serious shit.

The second is Creative Commons, CC. There are several variations based on if you can create derivative work, if you can make money off of it, if you need to credit upstream contributors. The one I use is CC-BY-NC-SA. That's you can create derivative works and distribute them provided you: attribute pervious authors i.e. who is it BY, you can't sell it i.e. it is Non Commercial, and since this was shared with you, you must Share Alike.

All that said, these are in a different category than commercial licenses, so restrictions may apply.

Also. "Intellectual property" is bullshit. It's incredibly ambigous and doesn't hold legal value itself. There are three things that do. Copyright, patent, and trademark. Each wrought with their own issues, but the broad concept of intellectual property only exists soley exploit those who don't know better.