Oh I see, Nash Bridges just isn't enough of a car-racing, hispanic sidekick having, San Fran cop for you.
I'm not even mad, I'm just disappointed.
Oh I see, Nash Bridges just isn't enough of a car-racing, hispanic sidekick having, San Fran cop for you.
I'm not even mad, I'm just disappointed.
Nanook of the North (1922) is considered to be the first documentary ever made, so how is there a giant spike on the documentary graph at 1910, and a smaller one shortly after?
Well whoever they were, they had no fucking clue what they were talking about, BECAUSE CERB WAS A FEDERAL PROGRAM AND PAID THE SAME AMOUNT TO EVERY PROVINCE.
Who cares what anyone said, the entire foundation of your argument is false, this is meaningless to the conversation and I specifically said either they are an idiot or you misunderstood.
Also I notice how you didn't actually link anything, and expect me to go watch an entire documentary (without naming it) to see your "proof".
You refuse to listen, have no idea what you're talking about, and keep repeating the same drivel over and over.
Then when I put actual logic in front of you, you cry about being insulted and run away? Pathetic.
Not necessarily, that depends on how it shakes down.
You are toxic and pathetic.
Wow you have a sad life if you care.
This absolutely is not true, and even if somehow there was a clip of someone saying that, the person saying it was an idiot and/or you misunderstood them, because CERB was federal and BC didn't offer a single cent more than any other province.
BC (specifically the lower mainland aka the area around Vancouver) has always had more homeless and transient people, because it's the only province where the winter won't flat out kill you if you are outdoors.
literally no downside except for needing to tax the rich
So literally no downside at all then?
You have not experienced Machiavelli until you have read him in the original Romulan!