wolfyvegan

joined 4 months ago
MODERATOR OF
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24232325

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/37895954

Archived

In recent years, China has been grappling with severe flood crises that have displaced millions, caused heavy economic losses, and exposed vulnerabilities in its infrastructure and disaster management systems. The China flood crisis is not just a national emergency—it is a reflection of global climate patterns that are becoming increasingly unpredictable and devastating. With torrential rains now an annual occurrence during the summer monsoon, especially in provinces like Henan, Sichuan, and Guangdong, the nation faces a daunting environmental challenge. This article explores the roots, repercussions, and remedies of China’s ongoing flood dilemma.

[...]

Floods in China are not new; the country has a long history of river-based civilizations, particularly along the Yangtze, Yellow, and Pearl Rivers. However, climate change has intensified the severity and frequency of floods, turning seasonal rains into life-threatening disasters.

[...]

At the start of July 2025, China's north and west is again on alert after sweeping rains trigger deadly floods.

China's north and west braced for more flash floods and landslides on Thursday as annual 'Plum Rains' left a trail of destruction and prompted the mobilisation of thousands of rescue workers to pull people from floodwaters.

Red alerts were issued tracing the rains as they moved from the southwestern province of Sichuan through the northwestern province of Gansu, and up to the northeastern province of Liaoning [...]

Extreme rainfall and severe flooding, which meteorologists link to climate change, increasingly pose major challenges for policymakers as they threaten to overwhelm ageing flood defences, displace millions and wreak havoc on China's $2.8 trillion agricultural sector.

Economic losses from natural disasters exceeded $10 billion last July, when the 'Plum Rains' - named for their timing coinciding with plums ripening along China's Yangtze River during the East Asia monsoon - typically reach their peak.

[...] According to Climate Analytics, a global climate science and policy institute engaged around the world in driving and supporting climate action, China not on track for a 1.5°C-aligned pathway to align with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal.

 
  • Brown spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus) are some of the world’s most threatened primates, as deforestation has razed about 85% of their habitat in Colombia.
  • With monkey populations living in patches of forests, conservationists in the Middle Magdalena region feared that low genetic variation could lead to a further collapse of the species, so they started creating biological corridors connecting forest fragments.
  • The project currently maintains 15 ecological corridors, with plans to create six more. Researchers work with landowners to create private conservation areas, leveraging the benefits of forest restoration for agriculture and ecosystems in general.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

"Carbon credits are a mirage, an accounting trick to let the rich world keep on burning fossil fuels whilst pretending climate change is being tackled somewhere else in the world."

They also do nothing to ensure that the forest doesn't get slashed and burned as soon as the project concludes.

 

archived (Wayback Machine):

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine):

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24142332

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24142922

archived (Wayback Machine)

Carbon credits have often been based on non-existent contracts with local people, or used for land-grabbing, or reforestation projects in which trees were not maintained and were soon cut down or eaten by cows, or otherwise fraudulent. In any case, letting humans take credit for photosynthesis is flawed emissions accounting, and the price of each credit is much lower than the social and environmental cost of the emissions that it offsets.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24142922

archived (Wayback Machine)

Carbon credits have often been based on non-existent contracts with local people, or used for land-grabbing, or reforestation projects in which trees were not maintained and were soon cut down or eaten by cows, or otherwise fraudulent. In any case, letting humans take credit for photosynthesis is flawed emissions accounting, and the price of each credit is much lower than the social and environmental cost of the emissions that it offsets.

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

Carbon credits have often been based on non-existent contracts with local people, or used for land-grabbing, or reforestation projects in which trees were not maintained and were soon cut down or eaten by cows, or otherwise fraudulent. In any case, letting humans take credit for photosynthesis is flawed emissions accounting, and the price of each credit is much lower than the social and environmental cost of the emissions that it offsets.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Exactly. No one wants to read that. It's counter-intuitive, and it goes against the prevailing narrative. But the narrative that the media repeats is based on GWP100 accounting, even though we don't have 100 years to address climate change. As Hansen and colleagues pointed out, people are not well-informed, and that's true of the people deciding climate policy as well. Ignorance and denial of the facts will continue to make the situation ever more dire.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Food production now contributes nearly one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, with agriculture and land-use change driving much of the damage. Forests are cleared for cattle, and vast areas are transformed into chemically intensive, resource-heavy crop systems.

To be clear, there are many issues with the "food" industry, but when it comes to its role in climate change, fossil fuel use is not the biggest problem. If we include animal-based "food" production, then the climate impact is much greater than the "nearly one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions" quoted above.

A Critical Look at UN IPCC's Emissions Accounting

the facts

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago

Thank you for this!

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

If only I had a tummy like that. And could fly. Would I want a cloaca though? I'm not sure...

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

I was thinking of this again, and the incredible price of $4-$12 per hectare could have been an amazing opportunity to reforest the cut areas with a food forest and live sustainably on that land while protecting the native trees that were still standing, using the existing private land ownership system against the very people who wanted to destroy the forest... I wonder if anyone at all took advantage of that opportunity.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From what I've heard from people in the Amazon, the cocaine mafia people don't like the cow people and will stop them from advancing further into the jungle in some areas (where the cocaine people presumably have their operations), so in a way, they actually reduce overall deforestation, even as they themselves do cut down areas of the forest for coca plantations and gold mining and such. They'll need to stop doing that stuff at some point.

If anyone would be interested in assisting reforestation efforts in the Amazon or elsewhere, that would be cool. Protecting Borneo and southern Cameroon from palm oil expansion would probably be a good idea too.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would have thought the same thing years ago when I was reading the humanure handbook. I used to only use fully rotted compost in the holes for the plants, and that usually wasn't available in anywhere near sufficient quantity (as I was planting hundreds of trees back then), so I'd need to go into the forest and scrape up the 1cm layer of topsoil and carry it back in buckets (usually uphill) to mix in when back-filling the holes. It's a wonder that I could sustain that as long as I did. Meanwhile I'd empty the toilet bucket into a ~1m^3 pile with metal mesh around it to keep it upright while allowing for aeration and a sheet of metal or hard plastic roofing over the top to keep the rain out, and I'd wait patiently for it to break down, only to have the neighbours' chickens or some other animal get into it and scatter it everywhere, and I'd need to start the pile again. Eventually I discovered that if the hole didn't hold water after a rain, and if there was sufficient dry organic material mixed in, composting in place worked quite well without it going anaerobic. Keeping it covered in the ground meant no chickens, no smell, no maintenance. As I get older, I crave simplicity more and more, so this method just makes sense.

I've since travelled around a bit, and it turns out that quite a few people also compost in-ground after discovering, as I did, that trying to compost the "proper" way didn't work very well in this climate. Some people even sheet-mulch with the contents of their toilet bucket, but I prefer not to do that in order to avoid any potential messes. (I have chicken trauma.) The only people I've met who continued to maintain aboveground compost piles long term (with underwhelming results) were those who had a fear of "germs" and ate cookery and took vitamin B12 supplements.

The one advantage of maintaining proper compost bins was being able to harvest tomatoes out of them. Now on the rare occasions that I eat tomatoes, the seeds get buried too deep to sprout.

Of course everything that I've written here only applies to the places I've lived in the wet tropics. Someone in a colder or drier climate would almost certainly need to do things differently.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't exploit non-human animals, so it's 100% humanure. When it's raining or night time, I poop in a bucket, which we can call a composting toilet, but when I can, I prefer to poop directly in the hole. Less work that way. What's the saying? "You say pathogen, I say vitamin B12"?

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I dug a hole. For banana. But first I must poop in it multiple times.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

You're welcome! To make a bootable USB drive with dd, the command would be sudo dd if=/path/to/installer.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1M && sync where the sdX is your actual USB drive.

view more: ‹ prev next ›