This. Many (most? all?) companies currently producing lab-grown flesh do continue to exploit animals in order to produce it, so not vegan, but there's no reason that it couldn't be vegan.
Oh shit. That sounds more like East Java than equatorial weather. And we're not even in the ENSO influence now. La Niña? Accelerating climate change?
Is the rain frequent enough that you can still grow food there?
Yes, but it's a big pain in the ass when the flowers are 20m up and only open at night.
Oh, you mean that amount of rain. I thought that you meant that it just didn't get as hot there because of the rainy weather. May I ask where you are? Is it a monsoon climate?
Best tip I have is to think through the philosophy and understand your ethical motivations for not exploiting sentient beings. Whether you focus on the rights of the animals or your own values, deontology is your friend. With the ethical foundation in place, you'll always find a way to figure out the practical aspects.
The equatorial weather is looking better all the time, isn't it?
Any tropical rainforest country where even if the laws are on the books, it would take all of their resources to enforce them. In America, Colombia and Ecuador seem like top options. In Africa, Cameroon and Gabon. In Asia, Borneo (Malaysia/Indonesia) or Papua New Guinea.
Yeah, if the West Antarctica ice shelf collapses, I don't see how it could be that low. But we can't predict exactly how long the ice will take to melt, so maybe it really will happen gradually.
the cooling is short term.
Yes. Exactly. The aerosols have a cooling effect that is fast-acting but short-lasting. Carbon dioxide has a warming effect that is slow-acting but long-lasting. In the long term, the warming effect prevails, but on an annual basis, the cooling effect dominates. We no longer have centuries to address climate change, so considering what the effect of any mitigation strategy will be in the short term is crucial.
#PortugueseCrimesMatter
Banana. Banana is good for you.