Sure. I take pride in planting fruit trees regardless of the result. Plus, anything that makes life more difficult for the cattle ranchers means that they have less time and energy to devote to cutting down more of the forest. But I suspect that at least some of the engkalas will survive to adulthood. They want to sell that land anyway.
Sometimes I do ask neighbours for their permission to plant fruit trees on their lands for our mutual consumption, but I don't negotiate with animal abusers.
...Is this a simple empirical question? !vegan@lemmy.world has the most monthly active users, followed by !vegan@slrpnk.net.
It's pretty arbitrary. In the broader sense, the word refers to any native flora or fauna that evolved in that location, and so its use in the human context doesn't make much sense. Basically, people use the term to mean any group of people who were living in a place before Europeans or other imperialists arrived. People commonly accept that humans did not originate in the Americas, but still the people whose ancestors were there before white people are called "indigenous" even though their ancestors also came from somewhere else. In Japan, it's the Ainu who were there before the next group of people from the mainland arrived. And so on.
Be Crime. Do Gay.
An excellent native option for colder climates! Which species is your favourite? :)
I agree. Peaceful cohabitation without domination can work quite well. I don't even know how many animals share this house, but it's probably hundreds at least. If they don't bother me, I don't bother them. It's only when the cohabitation is involuntary/non-consensual or when someone tries to control others by force or coercion that it becomes a problem.
These are important questions that not enough people are asking. See my other comment, but basically, I agree with your conclusion.
Pretty much this. Don't own other beings as property. Don't instigate violence against peaceful beings. Do not attempt to restrict the freedom of other beings. It really is that simple.
If you think that someone tampering with your drinking water without your consent is unethical, then we seem to be in agreement...?
(The right to affordable healthcare is a positive right, whereas the right to freedom from intervention is a negative right; they are not in the same category.)
Upvoting for thought-provoking spoiler properly marked as spoiler.