wobfan

joined 1 year ago
[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

It’s not like they’re using an LLM like ChatGPT. Science and research has used AI for years and it has a very big potential.

Most people nowadays mistake AI as LLM, and aren’t aware of the scientific fields where AI has been and is used, and has been used for way longer than LLMs are publicly known.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

All recent OSes even visually make it obvious that the microphone is used, after asking the user if they should allow it at all. I don’t think they can actually to more far than this. Maybe regularly ask the user if they really want the microphone to be used all the time.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

It isn’t better, it’s even worse IMO. But it’s just the truth. It is verifiable enough that apps cannot just spy via your microphone in any reasonably modern OS, not even the old versions. What has never been verified though is that there are non-zero-day-exploit-ways to spy through your microphone.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Bro, they don’t. The OS manages microphone access. If you allow it, yes, they may spy. But even then, the OS visible tells you via an icon that the microphone is used. It is the plain written truth, that we can not argue around. There has been a lot security research around this, stuff has been audited, Android is even open source, and no one has ever found even a hint of this being possible.

Echos and Google Homes are an entirely different story because they operate their microphones by design, their entire system works on always listening, and they don’t hide that.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

PLEASE PLEASE split WhatsApp from Meta. I can’t get my friends off it and lately the integration of this Llama button + automatic Llama search when I’m just looking for a chat really reminds me that I should not and should’ve never used this app.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think that's what the comment means. But still I think it's not only on them. Liam publicly and very very probably internally massively lobbied for him getting that seat rather earlier than later. I mean, sure, no one would say "no please let me learn first", but it's IMO not 100% on RBR.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It’s as uncreative as the track itself so I think it’s quite matching, nice

Gonna be a great race

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 11 points 7 months ago

My boy Danny coming back and this time he’ll be nailing it, 100% sure, just give him another chance (please)

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 11 points 7 months ago

Is putting another youngster that barely proved himself into the vice championship seat really a good idea? Like, yeah, Perez needed to go, but Lawson? Really? Not that I don’t like him, but he not even drove half a season. It’s Albons story all over again. I hope he can prove himself.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, Hulkenberg is close, and even a lot before Leclerc, in a Sauber. I think we can completely ignore this sheet, unfortunately.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago

I just hope he takes it as personally as last time and will start giving one world replies again in official F1 press conferences.

Another small hope is that MBS finally gets pushed out and can resume crashing old F1 cars. He was way better in doing that than in being FIA president.

[–] wobfan@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

It’s not getting better

view more: next ›