Wow, the cope is real. People have to be mad to call out the problems with a game?
Be honest, how much money have you spent on it?
wizardbeard
joined 2 years ago
Create the metrics that show RTO reduces productivity. It's the only thing they even pretend to care about.
So... most workplaces? Most companies have department wide goals and metrics that don't change just because half of a department walks. Even in good workplaces, hiring to "right size" a team takes time, and most of the time the work still needs to be done, and there's only so far management can stretch until it starts impacting external customers.
It sucks terribly. It's not fair. Life isn't.
More of an intentional choice they made, but Michael Cera's portrayal of Scott Pilgrim in the movie.
In the comics, Scott was a nerd, but was more of a jerk than awkward. There were a decent amount of flashbacks about Scott being the best brawler in Toronto and beating up entire school's worth of "bullies". Effectively a nerd that got tired of being bullied and started beating up people in response.
The comics don't skim over Scott's shitty behavior, and he gets called out on it far more frequently, keeping that aspect of his character fresh.
They also don't skim over Ramona being a mess either.
In the movie, Scott is awkward and nerdy (Cera's typecast at the time), and it's played like he doesn't know what he's doing is wrong (dating a highschooler as an adult, cheating on her with Ramona, beating up the person she leaves him for, etc).
Ramona's issues are skimmed over for the sake of her being a stereotype "manic pixie dreamgirl" rather than a deeply insecure woman running from each and every mistake she's made over the years.
So it's more of a case of "intentional streamlining and dumbing down character traits to fit into the expected romcom roles" than cool character being ruined by the actor, but at first watch it felt like the changes were all from Cera's performance.
That is not how your initial comment is worded, hence the downvotes. It has no consideration for those who can't, and your immediate response doesn't have that consideration either.
As always, there will be ways to point Windows Update at the long term support channels meant for government and people who have contracted support with Microsoft.
CoPilot and Recall are both disable-able, and I beilieve CoPilot can be fully uninstalled. If you don't have a Pro license for Windows (giving you access to Group Policy) it's a good idea to use MASGrave to activate as Pro for free. Most of these settings are best controlled through Group Policy, as that is Microsoft's official tool meant for SysAdmins to manage this zort of thing.
Still, terrible look for Microsoft, great time to try Linux. Just not so end of the world as a lot of articles seem to indicate.
Then just say there was GPL code in the project instead of that barely connected tangent. Or start with that before your tangent.
Not everyone has been following this shit as deeply as you may have.
Crap, the gallery is a booru site. God only knows how much data that is.
The Library is some sort of custom coded thing, but download links for book scans lead offsite to https://resha.re/accords/library/scans/
Looks like an open directory down to the root, so some of this might be easy.
Pretty sure that's the first one (I never played it) or Black Flag. Black Flag has intermissions in a game development office.
Ugh. Righteous ideas about how things should work don't change the fact that these network appliances doing it the wrong way still have years of time left before the bean counters consider them depreciated and let us replace them. Or that we're locked into a multi-year contract with this business system that requires updating certs through a web UI.
Yes, there are almost always workarounds and ways to still automate it in the end, but then it's a matter of effort vs stability vs time savings.
I love automating manual sysadmin actions, it's my primary role on my team. Still, ignoring the complications that will unavoidably arise in trying automating this for every unique setup is incredibly foolish.
You stated multiple times that you wanted to shoot him because he used the excuse that "it's just a game". That's a thin distinction at best.
You also use a separate account for your normal posting than your admin account, which feels needlessly sneaky.
Look, taking down the post was right call, and removing him from the mod position for arguing about it too. But the rest of this?
Telling someone that you want to injure them, then going on a multiple paragraph rant that is more about dunking on someone and venting than actually trying to inform isn't a good look for an admin.
I can't read their full responses that you deleted, but what you quoted from them reads like the kind of scared "stop yelling at me I don't understand what I did wrong please don't hit me" responses I gave to my mother while she was busy giving me reasons for therapy.
Normal users can get away with this sort of aggressive behavior because they don't have a position of power, but you do. You are inherently setting the example of what you want from your users and it's not a good look from the outside.
Now let's see if this criticism gets me banned too... hope not.