Can you at least see how both statements are whataboutism?
Yes that should be more talked about. So that makes this article invalid?
Can you at least see how both statements are whataboutism?
Yes that should be more talked about. So that makes this article invalid?
Adding to the other reply,
https://www.cbc.ca/news/trending/deadraccoonto-honoured-by-toronto-with-sidewalk-vigil-1.3146036
Is more probably what there referencing.
Doesn't make it better, but for sure a different cultural context
Not the person who replied to you, but yes I've worked a union job, and your accusation is still wild.
You think the workers know what's in the containers, but management doesn't?
Can you see how that doesn't change the response you replying to?
Some people didn't vote for him
Well other people didn't vote
Are two unrelated statements.
Except this whole article doesn't apply to android. Android AFAIK has 0 announced plans to do this. So why is it a concern?
When it comes to iPhones, it's not a shouldn't, it's a can't.
The way iOS limits background process means you can't. I develop for iOS apps for a living.
There's still you should never under any circumstances allow unsupported devices to be exposed to the internet or any way. Because that's how we get bot nets causing DDOS attacks.
An iPhone is not going to be that. This isn't phones in general doing this, just iPhones.
There are also far more efficient devices for that. More cost effective and more energy efficient.
I understand wanting to reuse old devices for something, but there's a limit to what is power efficient as well.
See it's not about posting slop for slop sake. It's so when the account become some kind of shill it has "legitimate" history to say they're not a shill.
How can buisness be done with a power so volatile?
Honestly no, and that's okay?
Early web2 websites like MySpace did become "popular". But IMO one of its layckings was trying out web2 by evolving something from web1's static websites.
Where Facebook is the platform that popularized web2 in a way that worked with what web2 was and fundamentally build something new off of that.
I think Lemmy/mastatdon/most current federated clones that exist today won't last all that long. Something that is built with federation to its core and instead of just being a feature, is central to its offering.
What is that? Not a god damn clue.
But I'm excited to try it out.
Disclaimer: not a historian. Born in the early 90s so a lot of my judgement above is bassed off of foggy memories and are my opinions and only opions.
You have to find the shop and pay some gold, but when you equip them you get +2 programming and can be combined with BLÅHAJ for +2 gender euphoria.
Not the person you replied to, but I do use Linux (arch btw).
Linux is a free (as in freedom) and open source software that basically powers the internet.
A vast majority of servers on the internet are running Linux. It's powerfully but that's a double edge sword. It's easy to cut yourself too if your unfamiliar with the edges.
Because it's completely open source, there are endless customizations and optimizations you can make. The art is knowing what, how, and where. But that's true of windows and macos.
It's vertically less creepy with AI and logging garbage compared to apple and Microsoft.
It's popular with nerds because it's free and customizable. IMO that can come at a cost of user-friendly experiences. But it's all about learning the edges. The other two have plenty, most are just used to it.