weker01

Ui ich kann gerade auf das Vorderende zugreifen. Zwar ohne Bilder, aber es geht.

Ohne die in irgendeiner Weise legitimieren zu wollen, aber es ist durchaus einleuchtend, dass Nationalisten für Umweltschutz sind. Im Sinne von Umweltschutz ist Heimatschutz.

Because people that don't care about privacy find this to be a nice feature.

There are gallery apps that let's you sort by location and it's nice if you want to search for the cool thing you saw once again.

Nothing at all...

You can go on adventures at any age as long as you are physically able enough!

And even then the physical requirements are not as harsh as one might think.

My use of language could very well be incorrect. I am not a native English speaker anyways. That's no reason to be so condescending.

I was just merely stating my credentials to have a basis of discussion but you do not seem to be interested in that.

I know. I've studied this extensively. I am specialized in formal logic and by extension set theory. I've worked with and help write actual research papers in this field where this is basic knowledge.

I've never claimed there to be a bijection between the reals and the natural numbers. Please point out what statement I made that is wrong. I would very much like to know.

Also no you do not have to accept choice for this to be true. ZF is perfectly acceptable to study various infinite sets with differing cardinality.

Edit: This is what I mean when I say that our intuition is broken. One set can be larger than the other but both be non-ending that is infinite.

Beeing larger does not mean it is more infinite!

That is until you meet analysis people that define a symbol for infinity (and it's negation) and add it to the real numbers to close the set.

Also there are applications in computer science where ordering stuff after the first infinite ordinal is important and useful.

Yea unfortunately we do kinda calculate with infinity as a concrete thing sometimes in higher level maths...

That is the way it is often taught but actually both sets are infinite that is have no ends or in other words are not bounded.

The thing that is confusing to understand is that the question how many there are and how much there is diverges at infinity.

Our intuition (as finite beings) is broken here. Both sets are infinite but in one is more than in the other. That does not make one set more infinite than the other. You cannot be more unending than to literally have no end.

Infinity + infinity = 2 * infinity... 3 * infinity ... Infinity * infinity = infinity^2 ... Infinity^3 ... Infinity^infinity ...

If infinity is the "first" i.e. Natural infinity than those are all well defined things (Ordinals)

I want to add that an annoying character can act morally totally OK but still be disliked. That is because the annoyance is real and their actions and their consequences are not.

You could have a saintly character that always does the "right thing" but if they have an obnoxiously annoying way of speaking (extrem high pitch, extremely slow or fast or something) I would still dislike them.

That is because I actually get annoyed watching the character while I do not react that harshly even to a drug kingpin as the consequences of their action is fictional.

I have that kind of feeling of annoyance for skyler. I really do get annoyed at her controlling and arrogant way to handle things as it reminds me of real people. I do believe that this was intentional to make her unlikeable on first glance.

No matter how moral or "normal" her choices are the consequences are still fictional while my annoyance is real.

Edit: irl the situation is of course reversed. The consequences are real and the annoyance temporary.

Did you talk to them about how it makes you feel? I would suggest doing that with the caviate that you should stay with your feelings and not be accusatory. Even though I know it is hard to do.