webghost0101

joined 2 years ago
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago

It can still be worse,

I once overheard a group of kindergarteners continually yelling “Skibidi toilet” at repeat.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Do you play Minecraft?

I have yet to watch it but i assume there is very little to connect with if you don't?

Depending on how old your kids are and if you are not already playing, playing on a local server together is great family time and can provide situations for real bonding aswell as real world educational discussions.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 weeks ago

All materials obtained just to turn it into jewellery is loss yes.

Mine is a gold alloy rather then pure and i am very fond of it. I derive pleasure from it everyday while the total loss was significantly less than the one in Bezos marriage.

We also had an engagement ring which has an industrial rock because no way where we going to waste our limited money on a real diamond.

All rings combined costs less than having a birth in a US hospital.

Both rings were still a loss to the planet, just like almost every novelty i own and many things i consume. Staying alive is a destructive action and all humans cause loss. That is normal and ok. What is not ok is not being aware/inconsiderate of it.

We should all strive to create the least amount of loss we are aware off and my older self having grown significantly then when i married would love a ring made from recycled computer metals which now often end up on a landfill.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Normal milk is still mostly water so basically everything turns in some kind of dense rancid cheese?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 41 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

So really that ring is pure loss.

No one owned that gem when it was just sitting in the ground. It took millions of years to create.

Some capitalism claimed it when one of his workers mined it. Calculated how much energy and labor it has costs to obtain it.

Then sold it for a massive markup compared to their own costs.

The machines have spend energy to get it (loss)

The workers spend life time and life energy to get it (loss)

Bezos his works spend their life time and energy to make him the money he now loses on this ring. (Loss)

The planet lost one of its rare gems. (Loss)

No lives are going to be saved using that rock, its not going to be used for breakthrough science, its not in a museum where we the people can admire our planet and learn from the its amazing processes. (No profit)

Instead its to decorate a hand so one person can be perceived as having value. Ironic.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 weeks ago

There saying the parties use different ideologies to cater to the masses which they don’t really care about because in the end they behave the same and taxpayer money gets wasted.

Whats always true is that money flows to military and corporations. Israel gets a stamp of approval (AIPAC)

What they fail to address is that only one party seem bend on building literal concentration camps. The pretends to be woke party is still evil and capitalist (Mussolini) facism but at least there not Nazi Hitler facism

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 32 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

They know to never use from your own supply. They know the downsides and admit openly that organics remain more reliable.

The one ripper i recall that did have chrome only did because she was attacked by a customer who chopped of her arm.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

“Caused” was not a good term but like i said i made that comment half jokingly

I find that almost everything can be boiled down to just be a display of quantum mechanics which is why id place it as more fundamental.

I cant really say that about gravity/spacetime though. Maybe someday we do find that it also is but for now it seems to be distinct.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Thanks for a well written reply.

Though i still dont quite get this

the electromagnetic force itself doesn’t “arise” from quantum mechanics, and you can explain things like electromagnets and a lot of common electric circuits (until you need a transistor) quite well without considering quantum mechanics.

You seem to say if we can explain x without y then y cannot be fundamental to x.

But can electromagnetism at all emerge if the quantum mechanics dont exist to emerge things like magnetism and some of the behavior of electrons?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That refines the definition but does not show a difference. There are reports of starving gazans too scared to show up to food distribution.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for creating transparent content!

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Maybe i am wording it wrong. I did make the comment half joking but my current understanding of how magnetism really works, which my physics teacher was unable to answer has a chapter on wikipedia called Quantum-mechanical origin of magnetism

I have no degrees in this stuff though, i just think about them recreationally.

The carrier particle thing to describe a fundamental force is new to me, and honestly feels very counterintuitive to how i started to understand things.

view more: ‹ prev next ›