webghost0101

joined 2 years ago
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely, just re-iterating using different words.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I am opposite to this.

Present day Google IS chrome and as much as i am disgusted by them and want them broken up forcing a sale of chrome does not make sense and could actually spiral into the collapse of the company. (Don't threaten me with a good time)

All internet platforms want a… well platform to have users on. An interface/environment that in its most profitable form can be plastered with ads.

For the google of old this used to be its search engine website.

But it sucks now, the web has kept growing and most people only need a different tiny fraction of it.

Yes its dominant, but its getting increasingly bad and will get increasingly useless as we start using smarter ai to filter (not re-generate) the web to our needs.

This is why openai wants to buy chrome, they want to replace all that google was with themselves.

Google also have their workspace platforms but there are no standalone apps. They are inherently designed for in browser use.

All of this means it makes a lot of sense they have a clear incentive to want to control the browser. Because its the frame that contains almost everything they do.

Compare that with microsoft, who owns the majority of operating systems, the entire office platform, and is also still competing with a search engine. And they still get to integrate edge like a glue no one asked for?

Burn both these corpos but the logic applied here makes no sense.

I am purposely ignoring all the other projects, robotics, Because honestly half of them never get to product and they don’t really effect the identity of theirs business as much.

If anything it would make more to sell these other projects like autonomous cars, you know they are just going to try take over taxi services first and delivery services second if they get to keep that.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 97 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Our grandparents earned enough as single earners to provide for their entire family and own a house.

Now 2 people work and they can barely pay rent on an apartment.

Its not hard to see why the right cries about the good old times, except somehow its the gays, and not the bourgeoisie that they believe are what caused the decline.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Idk,

Shouting “Hey, don’t do that” loud and clear may be more effective.

  • kid may have thought they where alone and will get jumped from getting caught.

  • May alert the parents their kid is up to mischief.

  • Doesn’t potentially start an escalation war with neighbors

  • Doesn’t carry the small risk of the child falling or otherwise getting hurt with you as an easy blame.

Think of it like this: Does the kid now understand the “evil” of their actions to try be better next time. Or will they feel vindicated by their parents support against your “evil”

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 months ago

Amongst all the other tells pointed out. The most obvious one right now is whats dubbed “AI-sans font”

There is atm only a single generator that can make this quality though. All ai generators have their unique quirks you learn to identity.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

I never started “beneficial”

Its entirely possible that ai agents build, regardless of whose interest, keep running after their original owner dies.

If the job is “become an industrialist, expand and drop % of all profits on this bank account” and its actually competent it could lead to industry itself being more and more monopolized by fewer and fewer ai.

That would halt the status quo where many human agents create companies for different reasons and industry is an ethical melting pot. Thats what i meant.

Till that point in time the morality of ai businessmen is not different in effect then a human businessmen. Once that point. This morality shifts into either extinction or thrive for humankind.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 35 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That is mostly but not entirely true, Firefox has a few variants of its own, alternatives do exist.

I did some research into the topic not long ago, you basically want to choose an engine and from that a browser

Gecko basd (Firefox)

  • librewolf
  • gnu icecat
  • tor browser
  • mullvad
  • zen browser

Goanna based (Fork of Gecko)

  • Pale moon
  • Basilisk

Servo based (very early in development/not for daily use)

  • servo browser
  • verso browser
  • flow browser

Ladybird: fully independent engine and browser

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I am a computer, can i still talk to myself?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 72 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Upvote because parents playing on a minecraft home server with their kids is a huge win for everyone involved.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

I actually replied a similar thing to someone else.

Here i am specifically speaking about the bureaucratic path a non human could use to obtain person rights.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

lol at at everyone in this tread learning the value of regular dr checkups.

For real a good idea to implement a habbit to systematically check every peep for this.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Both are true.

The first ai companies will be prompted by Humans.

A vast majority will be for profit. People want the ai to do the hard company work and collect the profit in their sleep as “owner” of the ai agent.

A good few people will do exactly the same but request non profit style and ethical focus.

Till we get to a mythical stage of agi that can actually decide globally if it thinks a company should exist or not and what purpose it should have, this is more or less same as the status quo.

view more: ‹ prev next ›