wandermind

joined 2 years ago
[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's good for when you want to keep up with what people or organizations you're interested in are up to. Artists, authors, game developers, etc.

It sucks for any kind of in-depth content or conversation, including politics.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

I know, I was making a joke

Because Queue<T> is typically read "queue of T"

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 15 points 9 months ago (7 children)

"You're a Queue of T"? I don't get it

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because the bird was originally named after the country, I have decided to update what I call the bird as well to match.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

As a linguist, I'd just shrug.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

I first thought this was a bad idea by Paypal but you opened my eyes

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

My guy, you should stop feeding the troll. I can keep coming up with bullshit indefinitely. The intent of my original facetious reply was to point out how ridiculous it is to react to a clearly ridiculous and unrealistic suggestion as if it was the most seriously considered expression of an actual policy suggestion ever. But it turns out some people just can't not take every single thing that is said with the utmost seriousness.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course a nuked country will be a nuked country. That's beside the point, moving the goalposts.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago

That's the point

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, they can return after the country has been glassed.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, but in reality nobody is going to nuke anybody, and certainly not because a random internet user vents their frustration at the situation with a clearly metaphorical and exaggerated request. Your reply was an overly literal reading of the comment, like replying to "go fuck yourself" with "...you realize that's not possible, right?"

I simply replied to your literal interpretation with a literal interpretation of my own.

view more: ‹ prev next ›