wagesj45

joined 11 months ago
[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, we do have some private companies that are doing things like this, such as Meta with its Llama models and Google with their smaller gemma models. But I would love for there to be some publicly funded options that truly belong to all of us.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This is awesome. Wish the USA could do stuff like this.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 6 points 8 months ago

Last date idea

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 12 points 8 months ago

"Could"

Goddamn it I'm sick and tired of these articles pussyfooting around the issue.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 22 points 8 months ago

Better stock up now.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 65 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You mean there's no chance that Wal-Mart might choose to absorb the increased prices out of the goodness of their hearts? :o

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 10 points 8 months ago

I like that this follows the age old tradition in VFX of "keep it far away, in the dark, and out of focus" to achieve maximum realism. :D You're learning from the experts, friend.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not saying you're wrong, per se. In theory it is good to keep that distance between the executive and the prosecutorial decisions. But I hold that view in the same way that I hold the view that war is bad. Sometimes it is necessary when you're given no other choice. Not to belabor the point, but this man is a danger not only to marginalized groups, but to American society and the world at large. The constitution imbues the presidency with the authority and power to take action and if this wasn't the time to use the power afforded to it, then I don't know man...

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

When the chief executive steps in to direct prosecution, it has a strong tendency to become political and lead away from democracy.

Seems like the same happens when we cling to that norm too closely, as well.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 5 points 8 months ago (5 children)

The chief executive of the US has been a Democrat for 4 years, and it was absolutely their responsibility to prosecute (or ensure prosecution happens to) anyone that broke the law, or to at least protect the country. The norm has been for Presidents to maintain a firewall between themselves and prosecutorial decisions, but that's not constitutionally mandated as far as I can tell.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 1 points 8 months ago

You're supposed to in the US, yes.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 7 points 8 months ago

He owes a billion dollars. Infowars isn't worth near that much. Even after the sell, he'll continue oweing hundreds of millions of dollars until the day he dies.

view more: ‹ prev next ›