vzqq

This is sone serious mismanagement on part of Arriva. Why the actual fuck would you put the onus of educating personnel on the guy they have been mistreating for years?

You are a global multi billion dollar company. Get some actual consultants in.

The terfs will not be missed.

“Domestic violence reporting at an all time high”

Many people have a visceral reaction to Palahniuk’s Guts, but it never hit me particularly hard. That and the underage incest impreg fantasies, it was always a bit of a turn off.

Honestly, for me, nothing beats good old Edgar Allan Poe, and he’s already in the syllabus.

Hashtag fuck cars

I can’t think of a single episode of television from the top of my head that is as overrated as Battle of the Bastards. If you look at the disastrous series finale, you can see the cracks of its demise starting to appear in that episode.

These things never really seem to get anywhere because of regulation stuff. If I didn’t know better I would suspect a trillion dollar industry is employing dozens of lobbyists to keep it from being sold.

But that’s nonsense of course, we’re a capitalist society where freedom and competition are valued above all else, right? Right?

A lot of people with janky GET APIs are gonna be really confused about this.

I’m ok with it. Stop using get requests to do stuff.

I’m not from anywhere you’d recognize. English is my third language. Don’t assume.

Also, we make our own culture here.

Yes, but this suit about a different matter (access to source code) which is a user right in the license. It’s the whole point of the GPL. In this suit the users (ie. The buyers of the devices that have received the binary distribution) obviously have standing.

The problem with relicensing is that the “authors” of a creative work (remember, this is copyright law) are changing the terms of the distribution, and the authors are allowed to do that. The issue at hand is whether the person doing the changing of the terms is allowed to make this change on behalf of “the authors”.

The users may be impacted by this decision, but they are not a part of the decision making process. Hence, no standing.

What you need in a relicensing is someone that asserts (co-) authorship of the work. That’s a much taller order.

I love that! It looks like an a and like an o too!

That’s true, but only contributors have standing to do something about it. Unless there are contributors with contributions that are not easily patched out that are willing to make a case out of it, we’re stuck with the last GPL version.