voldage

suction cups

I also use dollars instead of integral symbols, I don't do math though.

General strike lets gooo

I'm pretty sure that a bartender that doesn't stock a specific brand of beer out of disgust for it won't sell it to you. You're way overreaching with your criticism of reasonably viable story.

Sounds like DEI, so I think it's not going to fly in the current political climate.

I send anything that isn't plain text or something I requested straight to security to keep those fucks sharp, I wish they summarized emails I sent them instead of complaining that I keep doing it though.

Having principles you stuck to that are helpful to the world is never cringe, it's a display of feeling of inferiority when someone critiques you for having a virtue. They feel that their comfortable bed of lies is threatened when someone shows that it's not societaly acceptable to be a dick, while they lived their lives accepting that they may sometimes be allowed certain priviledges if they conform to the "norm". I hope one day we get the world to the place where virtues are rightly celebrated instead of being called cringe.

They are beholden to the same investors. It's the investors that pick whenever we get rainbow flavored wage slavery or nazi flavored slave-wagery for the next 4 years. It seems that our overlords decided that it's too costly to put effort into pretending that that's not the case, so we got this piece of shit basicially saying the quiet part out loud. I am actually surprised how little backlash from the USA citizens happened so far, but I hope the guilottines get deployed soon, because it gets embarassing watching this farce.

Robes? Sure, they are comfy. But a hat this pointy? In a place that I'd assume to be pretty windy? If that's a fashion statement, then that's really impractical and I hope you're not allowed anywhere close the runic circles.

Just because they aren't faceless doesn't mean they aren't as bad. In case of corporations, at the very least, anyone up to CEO could claim they were doing what their boss/investors told them/expected them to do, they have the mirage of fabricated innocence. The guilt is also spread more thinly, with many, often low paid employees contributing a small portion towards the greater legal crime.

Small landlords have none of those delusions available, though from my personal, anecdotal experience, higher management in large corporations also often personally own real estate and rent it. I'm working in IT, but I have no reason to think it would be in any different elsewhere. I was led to understand it was "normal" and "smart". So I'd say it's the same kind of people that make decisions on top of the real estate corporations, and the petite landlords. And yeah, I'm excluding from that, obviously, renting a flat you've gotten as inheritance from your grandma or something, though I have more fundamental issues with the inheritance thing itself.

I'm all for building class consciousness and having people be involved deeply and personally in politics, but USA absolutely isn't there yet. You need populist messaging and need to make sure people see you in good light if you want to win elections. People didn't believe Harris nor Biden what they were saying about Trump, even though those things were true. People had few bad years economically, and while they knew it was due to covid, they blamed Dems. It was irrational, just as Trump's image as a working men ally, but the electorate isn't moved by rationality, but rather - you got it - vibes. Entire charade about inflation was a lie, but they failed to communicate that. They added fuel to the fire by even acknowledging the illegal immigrants narrative, despite everything showing that both legal and illegal immigrants commited far less crimes on average than USA born citizens. They cracked down on pro-palestinian protests and fed the antisemitic conspiracy theories. It goes on, and on, and on. And I get that you might disagree with me on whenever those things were good or not, but it doesn't matter, if they can't make more people think Dems have their best interests in mind. It's literally the single job they have during the campaign, and if they can't instill the feeling that people must vote for them or else fascists will win, then it's on them. They did it wrong. You can't expect people that doesn't care about politics to rally up behind them spontaneously, they need to be rallied. You can't expect people passionate about human lives not to protest a genocide, you need not to support it and not give them a reason to protest. And no, I'm not talking about protesting as in not voting - we already had several rounds of surveys that showed beyond any doubt, that those people in swing states voted almost exclusively for Harris, despite their grievances. It was mostly people who felt neither side had anything good to offer that failed to show up. And it's those people, who aren't interested in politics, who just want to do their thing, that Harris and her staff was supposed to convince, but the vibes were off, children died, protestors got maced and locked up, and lies about immigration and inflation were left not debunked. They came out strong after announcement of the ticket and got a record high funds from small value donations, but quickly changed their tune to pro-corporate businesses as usual, and the median voter visibly wasn't convinced by that. The surveys showed that people felt the economy was bad, so how could the messaging of "we won't change shit" convince them? Price gouging bit was good, too bad it was dropped stright away within a week. Tim Walz calling the fascist out was very good, but he got muzzled almost immediately. And then what, Liz Cheney? Bill Clinton telling Arabs in Michigan that "Jews were there first"? I mean, come on, you can't say you believe they did great and that their messaging was impeccable. And even if you somehow do, voters didn't, and you need at the very least to acknowledge that fact. The messaging was ineffectual, and that's on Dems. They also cultivated the image of government that is immune to change and stagnant, although that's not the issue with campaign but with their politics in general, and that made their electorate less interested when very radical change threatened them. Some people were radicalized specifically by this percieved stagnation and voted Trump just for something to change. Harris and her team had a lot of material to work with, but decided to keep to the old and tested playbook instead, which, judging by the elections results, was a mistake. People that were somewhat interested in politics and believed that Trump was bad, voted overwhelmingly for Harris, even if they disliked her or her campaign, but that's a drop im a bucket. Most people don't care, and you need politicians to reach them to make them care - or else they might blame them for something bad in their lives, maybe completely unrelated, maybe not, and just vote out of spite for the opposition, or maybe just wallow in apathy and not vote at all. I hope I made my point clearer, if it wasn't transparent previously.

They weren't unaware of the policy because of "whining", but because Dems failed to effectively communicate their proposals. They also failed to combat misinformation from the right, but this I'll forgive them for this one because at the very least they had opponent in that field that pushed back. That's not the case for their atrocious campaign that bled voters left and right.

If Americans are unaware or not happy with the candidate stances on various policies, that's entirely the candidate fault. And when the stances they're aware of are "I wouldn't do anything differently than Joe Biden" when JB had to be switched out from the race due to his unpopularity, then the candidate just digs their electoral grave.

You're entirely missing the point of my previous comment. Dems lost, because they couldn't make their voters feel like they were the right choice. You're sarcastic about "vibing" but it's exactly what required for politician to win an elections. People aren't wise and don't delve in deep in policy, as it is excellently shown by morons playing catch up with economic difficulties Trump's rule already brought. It's politician job to make their electorate trust them. It is their failure if they can't (or don't want to, if they are bought as controlled opposition) make that happen. You really can't say that "Dems had great campaign but people didn't like it" because it's precisely the popularity that makes the campaign great. And no, Harris and her team had terrible campaign, and lost to the opponent that was very easy to trip up and expose. You trying to blame people for not vibing with genocide doesn't help either. And if me telling you that Dems had bad campaign "lowers your faith in humanity", then it seems you might be in a cult and not be ready for a mature discussion about the direction that Dems politics will take them. You might want to have that checked out.