Developer is not controlling the price, they're the highest bidder. It seems like a positive anyway - existing owners can sell at a high rate, government can get more tax, more tax can fund more support for the poor
vin
Power automate has so much potential and promise, but it just sucks to implement anything more than built in templates.
Have Russia and China joined upto ICC?
I love looking at hill ranges covered in wind turbines. The swiss disagree though.
Debian and Ubuntu works great on my ThinkPad. Getting better battery life in fact coz it sleeps properly compared to windows.
Delivery apps are not in a strong position though - both demand (customers) and supply (delivery personnel) easily change where they are on.
How does this work for international performers though?
Until the baby starts eating solid food, it's a good idea to use cotton nappies, as I did with my kid
Until the baby starts eating solid food, it's a good idea to use cotton nappies, as I did with my kid
Can’t wait to see how this will be an implementation designed to be crippled, like they did with web push (why can’t i enable non silent notifications?)
AI needs training data and level 4 autonomous driving is possible. Mercedes and Waymo are doing it. It's not fraud to try faithfully. Also, the author's premise itself is wrong, what Theranos promised was physically impossible.
Pardon, I don't get this - "The developer can position themselves as the “highest bidder” by an extremely small margin over the property’s historical value, denying the current owner the windfall from the recent removede in land value." - Wouldn't ask/bid and transaction value determine the land value? Why does the land value tax increase a lot if the best offered purchase value will be only slightly higher than historical?