unknowing8343

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Isn't it crazy? When I found it I couldn't believe my eyes. I mean... Hopefully it does not disappoint when I get it

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, damn, so I write like AI, should I take that as compliment or criticism?

I am just a dude with small hands that did not know this phone existed until now. And I fell in love. That's it.

I don't think 4G will get outdated in the next 5 years considering that 4G devices are still being launched today... And also considering that most people are just connected to Wi-Fi anyways...

I think we can be fine with this phone for 4/5 years and the Jelly Star 5G will probably be out there when the time comes.

I don't think that is possible, I believe one of the two slots is nanoSIM only, but will report back.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hopefully everything goes fine!

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

4G is here to stay for a long while. It's fast enough for 99% of cases and 5G only covers very small areas, and will only be used (at least for now) on crowded areas where it makes sense.

Also, this device has 480p screen... I think 4G is pretty fine.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have not forgotten. And this is not so much swimming upstream but rather, as Captain America said, it's more like planting yourself like a tree and say "no, you move".

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't even know something like that was possible!

I don't have to provide any source because Huberman has done it already for you.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay so, half of those links have nothing to do with Huberman, so I am not going to bother commenting on those.

As per the other 2, one is about his personal life, which... Why should we give a f*ck? I don't see how that is related to his podcasts; and the other link is a video where some scientists say "actually Huberman does a great job of bringing science to the masses, but of course some of the technicalities get lost when reducing things down"... Um...

So the only argument against Huberman is that some dumbf*cks may bypass his warnings about experimental treatments... So let's ban science discussions in general... Right?

Still, I am not saying that his work is perfect. There are things I've seen in the podcast that I did not like (Zuckerberg's one, for example), but that is the good thing about life, you know? You can like some parts and not the others.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Thousands of papers against a single article. Yeah, right.

To be honest, I would love to see him truly debunked. That would be incredibly useful. But so far science has his back, and as long as that keeps going, I am going to listen to what he says.

view more: ‹ prev next ›