This error does not mean that you are signed in or not. The error means that YouTube is asking the Piped proxy to sign in with a YouTube account, probably because it has been detecting quite the weird behavior of a single IP address viewing too many videos at once.
AI doesn't do feelings
How can I have a serious conversation with these annoying answers? Come on, you know what I am talking about. Even an AI chatbot would know what I mean.
Any AI chatbot, even "general purpose" ones will read your code and will return a description of what it does if you ask it.
And particularly AI would be great at catching "useless", "weird" or unexplainable code in a repository. Maybe not with the current levels of context. But that's what I want to know, if these tools (or anything similar) exist yet.
Thank you.
Of course, 100% reliability is impossible even with human reviewers. I just want a tool that gives me at least something, cause I don't have the time or knowledge to review a full repo before executing it on my machine.
I just want a report that says "we detected in line 27 or file X, a particular behavior that feels weird as it tries to upload your environment variables into some unexpected URL".
I'm afraid to tell you that your e-book deDRMing is very much considered piracy. 😅
Piracy is easier than ever IMO. 20 years ago it was messy, and full of viruses and fake content. Nowadays there's plug&play pirate services with refined content.
There's so much people in the world today convinced that their subscriptions are worth it that I think they'll let pirates coexist in peace, because they know pirates wouldn't pay for it anyways.
Yes, of course, the idea would be something like passing the AI a repo link and a prompt like "this repo is supposed to be used for X, tell me if you find anything weird that doesn't fit that purpose".
I understand, but I wouldn't be surprised to see some solution out there that could maybe feed the AI chunks of code without context... It may still be able to detect "hey you told me this software is supposed to do X and here it seems to be doing Y".
I guess we'll have to wait a couple of years for these tools to be accessible and affordable.
I am a fan of Python's or Rust's official conventions.
For package names, tho, I don't get why this-is-used over this_clearly_better_system, as I would expect a double click to select_the_whole_thing, whereas it does-not-happen-here.
It's really so sad to see how marketing alone can shape the landscape even when they 🍎 are scamming their users so hard.
In every post of this kind I am amazed at so many people using
nanoinstead ofmicrowhich is SO MUCH BETTER while being the same thing at the same time.