unceme

joined 2 years ago
[–] unceme@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago

If you're talking about standard security cameras usually the footage will get completely overwritten after afeew days unless there was an incident to prompt review of the footage-- and even then it usually gets deleted at some point. Its not like with social media data gathering where they're collecting all that information in order to build a personal profile of everyone-- security cameras just exist to review incidents that happen in the public realm and there's no real incentive for a public transit agency to track every single person that appears on their cameras.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago

There's cameras everywhere watching the road too if you really care that much and you better believe your car model and license plate is a much more reliable form of identifying information than a blurry face on a bus security camera.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That assumes the train is traveling at its maximum speed for the entire duration of the trip-- which is almost never the case, even in China. For a route that long with many many stops large portions running over rough terrain necessitating curves and grade changes the actual average speed along the route would certainly mean the average speed of the route would be much slower.

Ultimately, spending a tremendous amount of money embarking on an ultra-high speed rail route between the coasts-- which would certainly be one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects in human history-- would be a waste of time and money compared to almost any other rail project. All that money would be much better spent on high speed rail where it actually makes sense, and on conventional rail connecting every city in the US.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

NY to LA will never be 14 hours with current or near future technology. Its 50 hours from Chicago to LA with the slow trains and while high speed rail is a significant improvement its not crazy enough to get speed increases like that.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Kate is great!

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago

There's a lot of non-Chrome Chromium browsers.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago

I'm typing this message on GrapheneOS. My point isn't that it's completely impossible but rather that degoogling basically has to become your hobby in order to fully do it. It requires a level of effort that's not practical for the average person so its unreasonable to expect everyone to do it. Also, FOSS and non-google alternatives are often not as good as the service google provides for free, like Google Maps. I use OSMAnd as my daily maps app, but its pretty finnicky and isn't anywhere close to the smooth, polished experience of Google Maps, and its lacking some important functionality. I still use it, because I'm committed to trying to avoid Google software as much as possible, but its definitely not the best experience.

Also, a lot of institutions andemployers use the G-Suite and so its impoesible for people that have to do business with those organizations to be entirely free of google. My university uses the G-Suite and when school comes back in the fall I'll be stuck using it again. The local school district does too.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I run a degoogled Pixel 6A with GrapheneOS and Linux on my desktop. I logged in to Google once on my phone and still haven't logged in a single time on my desktop. I don't use any of the gsuite apps.

I don't think the average person should or could reasonably do this. Google is so closely ingrained in society that removing it from your life requires a significant amount of effort to make sure you can still have as much of the stuff you need to participate in society as possible. Some of that stuff just doesn't exist now without Google.

I'm glad that the software and tools and resources exist to de-google yourself for those that want to but its just not an option for most people.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everyone is recommending Tails but I feel like that's a lot more intense security and privacy wise than GrapheneOS, since Tails runs in a live environment only.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

wear more clothes

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

Heat is the real killer. As someone else said with fenders and a raincoat the former is very manageable but there's nothing you can do when the heat index is in the high 90s/early 100s every day from late May through the end of October.

[–] unceme@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Bikes are wonderful and amazing and awesome but I was a full-time bike commuter in my southeastern US city for two years and I can't blame anyone here who doesn't.

In the summer you get so hot that you need to expect to have somewhere to change or ideally shower wherever you go if you're gonna be there for a long time. There's very few dedicated bike lanes and a lot of roads may not even have sidewalks so you need to be able to bike on the open road sharing space with cars, which means you need to have an athletic ability to be able to maintain a decent pace on the road.

Even still you'll end up having dozens of close calls from reckless cars and maybe even an accident or two which if you'll be lucky are minor. I got hit by a Jeep that blew through a stop sign ironically on a bike path. I was okay but my bike had considerable damage. Another time I almost got sideswiped by a car that pulled through to parking on the other side of a bike lane without looking.

In short unless very significant infrastructure improvements are made (which are not expensive and are not really difficult to implement technically), biking is inaccessible as a regular form of transportation for most people in most parts of the United States. Which is very unfortunate, because biking is awesome.

view more: ‹ prev next ›