ubergeek

joined 8 months ago
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am wondering if the mods of news@lemmy.world and politics@lemmy.world regret censoring the people who rightfully said these things

Probably still thinking "This is just a Russian disinfo campaign to smeer the libs!"

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago

I'm betting Mark Cuban. They (I believe, based on the sudden interest in him as a "Progressive billionaire" on various social media platforms, and in person talks) that the solution to a Reich Wing Oligarch is a different Reich Wing Oligarch, but Blue this time.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago

Nah, I think we should run Biden one more time. Surely, it'll be different this time! /s

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago

Yes. As much as the Dems insist "This is a critical juncture, and we need to unite", they mean "You need to unite behind whatever we say you need to do".

See post-election: The only thing the Dems want to do is wear matching outfits, rather than vote "No".

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How are laws stating "If you've beaten your spouse, you cannot own guns" geared towards conservatives? Or, is that a slip of some sort?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, it does not say any disagreement with Trump

It literally does. That's how it defines "Trump Derangement Syndrome".

But yes, Walz will veto it, thankfully.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

But you should absolutely feel bad for his wife.

His wife likely was "One of the good ones, not the dirty Mexicanos that Trump is going to clean out of this country!!!!"

When you have 9 people eating dinner with a nazi, you have 10 nazis eating dinner.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

I have no issue with fash bashing fash. Thins their numbers, and makes it easier for the rest of us.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

Of course he doesn't, but we are talking about the Here and Now.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe this situation will urge people to take it seriously and take steps sooner.

She literally was taking care of it.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

They've never really been focused on terrorism. It was always about going after brown people.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago

They always were.

If you are within 100 miles of an international port, which includes international airports, not just water ports, or border crossings, your rights are non-existent, and can be ignored by law enforcement at their discretion.

https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone

view more: ‹ prev next ›