Nah, they measure memorization under stress. Can you recall that tidbit of information to solve the problem the interviewer has given you? If you never have needed to solve a problem like that then you’re shit out of luck, even though solving that problem for the first time (by whomever) definitely didn’t do it under stress in a job interview.
tyler
I learned this was possible from the most recent season of Jet Lag
Yes, and you came to the conclusion yourself at the end. Why do you need to stop using discord? Yes lots of people have complaints about it (valid) complaints, but you can prevent discord from tracking your location and why would you be discussing private stuff in there in the first place.
It’s going to be an incredibly difficult life to go full privacy. You can beat 99% of people with just Adblock and pi.hole. Every step further really just gets you slightly more invisible. Getting an iPhone and using their mode for protecting against state hackers is as far as I’d ever go and even that’s just not necessary.
What are you implying?
You’d need a check to make sure they don’t wish for something not allowed (like more wishes).
Well if the first statement is true (matching email addresses is allowed) then it’s just as effective as that.
You’re the one redefining history dude. Even another person in this comment section is telling you how it never meant that to start with. You linked an article from a business school that literally makes up history. Your “source” calls the General Motors blog “social media”.
Nah I understand that, I just don’t think politicians even have time to come up with campaign ads when the timeline is so short. Maybe I’m wrong.
Oh interesting!
Mine were stolen at church camp. I had planned on keeping them until they were worth something.
Completely ignoring the UN voting numerous times to hold Israel accountable and the US being the only one to block the vote. And the EU sanctioning. And France, Germany, the Netherlands, etc with their stances against Israel. Kinda seems like you’re just looking for reasons. Literally here’s an article from today. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/31/senate-democrats-vote-block-israel-arms-sales/
From a few months ago. https://www.axios.com/2025/04/03/senate-democrats-cancel-military-aid-israel
“If you take a dispassionate view” you’d stop ignoring the evidence that there is a difference between the two. I’m guessing you didn’t vote for Kamala and you’re looking for justification to make your reasoning less ethically dubious.
Edit: I’ve read your other comments in this thread and according to you the last statement I made is incorrect so please do explain the reasoning here. You’re either not paying attention to what’s actually happening, you haven’t fully thought about the situation, or you didn’t bother to research before making your comments.
Wait are you suggesting I put a crumb tray under my chair or that my chair already has a crumb tray and I never noticed?