Might be a silly question, but is YouTube TV considered a part of YouTube here?
trashboat
joined 7 months ago
ELI5 I noticed cornstarch in each of the sauces listed here, what purpose does it serve?
Reader mode is great, though I’ve seen some sites that seem to have taken deliberate steps to make their articles unviable with it by making all the text disappear as soon as you turn it on
Same here, Malcom X practically read like a footnote to me when I was taught by my school
Just finished playing Outer Wilds for the first time- definitely one of the most incredible games I’ve ever played
Ohhh yeah still haven’t played that one, I’ve heard so many good things about it though
I’ve only played Nintendo games on-and-off but the last truly special innovation I can remember to the Mario formula was the Super Mario Galaxy games. I can’t recall anything else like it that they’ve done recently
I gave patient stupid drug
Oh man…
This run was a minute ago but pretty sure I leveled Five of a Kind up to like 25-ish by the time I lost
I mean we’re talking about kids who are functionally illiterate. The system has failed to teach them this basic skill. Critical thinking about complex and nuanced topics is way beyond that!
I agree with you there, and I don't think we're really all that far off from each other. Writing has both synthetic (the critical thinking to which I referred) and syntactical (what I believe you're getting at) components to it, and kids have been missing out on the synthetic component for quite a while now and are now beginning to miss more of the syntactical part as a result of AI.
Where I disagree with you is:
And the problem is they’re not going to learn the basic skills if they use AI to prevent themselves from doing any work.
Kids not doing their work didn't start with AI. LLMs haven't even been mainstream or otherwise publicly available for three years yet. A lot of these kids were never going to complete coursework in good faith because the curriculum is failing to engage them. Either that, or there are influences in their lives that make it altogether impossible, such as poverty or neurodivergence. In my other comment I was speaking mainly to career readiness, but the principle of meeting students where their circumstances and interests lie applies throughout their time in K-12.
A trend I've noticed in this issue is demonizing students (hence why I keep bringing it up). These kids had nothing to do with their parents putting iPads in front of them instead of reading to them when they were little, or having to take classes that were designed before their parents were born, or so many other observations about the structure of education that make it archaic and broken (perhaps by design, but that's out-of-scope here). Every stakeholder around this issue should be discussing with each other the ways that school can better serve students; instead, we've hastily created a stigma that using AI to complete assignments that you don't understand, don't have time for, or simply couldn't care less about makes you a cheater.
It is truly a wicked problem, and I believe the way that our leaders haven't adapted education is primarily to blame. I haven't even mentioned social media, and I think that government's inability to regulate it has its share to blame for kids struggling in school. But as problematic as AI is, it is not the reason why this is happening, and we may have to agree to disagree on that point.
Lomp