tram1

joined 2 years ago
[–] tram1@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I did 32nd Rule but I broke Rule 5. I wasn't going to juggle the hex colour, the length of the password, the captcha, and the youtube url, so that the numbers add to 25... Don't know if it's possible even...

https://imgur.com/a/t8L6J1c

edit: 31 to 32 was hard, I added a before pic as well, had to change strategy.

[–] tram1@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

PAUL HAS STARVED is the most evil thing :P

Also I got Madagascar, which was kind of hard...

[–] tram1@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe it's check? Qe7+

[–] tram1@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't think this is what they mean. If you read the whole paragraph they also talk about "[...]the data that is not covered by end-to-end encryption"...

It says that they have nothing to give on Secret chats, and then: "To protect the data that is not covered by end-to-end encryption[...]" ... "Thanks to this structure, we can ensure[...]" ... "To this day, we have disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments."

I mean, I would consider phone numbers, IPs, metadata, non-secret chats (I don't know if that's a thing, never used Telegram), to be "user data".

[–] tram1@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Telegram states at their site that: "To this day, we have disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments."

But according to Spiegel this is false. I don't know German, I read the article using google translate, correct me if I'm wrong.

Here is a quote from the article: "Contrary to what has been publicly stated so far, the operators of the messenger app Telegram have released user data to the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) in several cases."

If this is true, the fact that they are lying is very worrying...

[–] tram1@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you Big Brother?

view more: ‹ prev next ›