trailing9

joined 2 years ago
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

The paradox of the paradox: there wouldn't be a paradox if the philosopher wouldn't be stuck in the logic of a limited model and a distorted assumption about growth.

Only because there exists the possibility that a movement can grow doesn't mean that it will grow.

Intolerance is also not real, like the war on hunger. There is no enemy, but instead there are people to feed.

This leads all to a simple answer that hides that 'let' s give them a chance' was driven by intolerance for socialists and communists, which should ring a bell.

People are so proud that they are allowed to hate the right enemy that they don't ask what those humans actually need to become friends. (Which doesn't mean apeacement!)

*edit: could the downvoters please leave a note and state where they disagree, please?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, let AI execute all business processes as designed.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

I should have added a ! behind form. I meant another form of respect, not the opposite.

They are tolerant by avoiding conflicting situations. You want them to change into your form of tolerance where conflicts are ignored.

Both work, but only one at a time.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

All focus and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You know what it wants. Stop pretending!

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But 'them' are not them, they are also only their facade. It's the opposite form of respect. Instead of accepting who you are, they don't ask you to accept who they are.

To finish in flames: judging by the rejection of Southern culture, there is a limit of what northern culture can accept comfortably. If they cannot accept southern people the way they are, how can they claim to be better in acceptance?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Union busting is a business decision, preserving one's life should have higher priorities. Violence will be higher if lives are defended.

Workers would become class losers in a second step when a new elite can gain control by disenfranchising workers again.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reposting my question from the other post:

Can lemmy become the place on the internet to discover the best accounts on X and thus become popular?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Iran was complicit even though the United States has no intelligence or evidence

Is there no racism in the army that he isn't worried that the statement looks too close to general Powell's speech about WMD?

He most likely is right but the similarity is unfortunate.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

Because she did science and not just liked it. Females know.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the references.

view more: ‹ prev next ›