trailing9

joined 2 years ago
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

It's not a matter of responsibility.

The rich and powerful won't safe the world. If we don't want to live in a world with so many natural desasters that there is no farming and only synthetic food, then things have to change.

The opposite of the rich and powerful are not the weak and vulnerable but almost everybody. It's OK to let things happen but it's also possible to change everything, maybe even in a week or two.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

If renters don't pay the fee, what prevents brokers from charging the landlords, who will increase rent to make it back?

Why not offer a central register where every offer has to be registered which could eliminate the need for brokers entirely?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Makes me believe that there is no elite but just stupid rich people. Even if you don't care about the suffering, how can anybody in power let that evolutionary knowledge of the universe go to waste?

That doesn't make me comfortable about the future usage of AI.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Is the mailbox safe?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

How to sing, dance and make music.

Life would be different if people wouldn't argue but express their emotions in a song.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Where is the fascism? Should I ignore the reasons for homelessness and pretend that it is a normal state of life? Have I missed the memo where people are voluntarily homeless?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

So that's it.

Here, you are willing to suggest death to resolve conflicts.

There is also this reference:

A Two hustlegrind comment chains comment where you, as I interpret it, reject competition as a tool to prevent market dominating rent seeking.

The upvotes reaffirm you.

From my perspective that's fundamentally wrong. You are either able to turn everybody into a friend and thus don't need conflicts, or you manage conflicts by distributing power.

If I don't see the light and you know how to turn the world into a better place, good luck for your approach.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Prepare another NO U answer. That comment is bullshit unless the Great Egress has actual meaning. In that case, please elaborate. Otherwise try again. How do you want to resolve the surveillance state?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I would like to know how you want to resolve the surveillance state.

Putting me into that clichee of a tech bro as if I don't care about anything else, how is that not dehumanising?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

There are plenty of open issues that you have chosen to ignore while you enjoyed dwelling in insults. I get the hang of it but let's not pretend that's me who is dehumanizing.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (7 children)

You used that before. Are you chatgpt? Being ignorant is not an action.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Read the room. It's me who is upvoting you.

Nobody is following this track because it's rooted in a big misunderstanding that you are unwilling to let go. The other replies to my comment are far more interesting.

You are the ignorant creep if you think that that quote was my opinion. It's me putting your words in your mouth. But good to know that you recognize incoherence when you think it's coming from me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›