Are they not allowed to mention lemmy or do they not know?
If people don't know, how can they be reached?
trailing9
joined 2 years ago
MS seems to have the infrastructure to manage public opinion. How do they manage it without anybody spilling the beans? Is it already entirely AI generated?
Your brain knows the power of a gambling addiction. Make the receptors pay for the next plate.
To stay obvious, what's fascinating is that those networks are small, its members the most intelligent people available and they meet each other regularly in person at conferences.
Why do they accept the lock-in?
Being a homo sapiens and not elephant-cute must have been not that much fun...
It's inherent to grants. If you want scientists to choose their topics you have to fund them unconditionally.
To mention the obvious, it's the same network effect that keeps people on X and Reddit.
As the others wrote, you should be able to reply.
Additionally, I would like to remind you of the star. You can mark posts and comments and find them in your profile.
Why do you browse to other instances? Apart from channels on defederated instances you can subscribe to all channels on your main instance.
Does Lemmy need artificial 'all' channels that include all channels of an instance? Then there would be no need to directly visit other instances.
It's like MySpace and Facebook. The momentum can switch at any moment. Like others said, it's better to fix some important issues before Lemmy becomes popular.
It's very likely that Lemmy will be more popular because Lemmy is more open for innovations. This is not Linux where you have to learn something first. If the frontpage is better, people will switch. Reddit cannot rock the boat whereas on Lemmy, each instance can try a new feature and show its usefulness.
If people don't want the future, why not buy it for cheap and make the most out of it?
They have deserts for solar energy and cheap workers. What else do they need?