Same point was made in a reply 13 hours before your comment. If you want an answer you can find it there.
trailing9
joined 2 years ago
Right. It is very difficult to find the couter-example to such a solid argument.
Yes, create the voting base.
If democrats move right, they take votes from Republicans and make it easier for third party to win.
will always snap back to two major parties
So make at least one of them a party with reasonable policies
It is if you care about the actual tangible effects
Of course people care. That's the lock-in.
, who will lose their money quickly.
Video calls and recordings. Chatgpt. Why will future generations need scripture and math for everybody?
Some should learn it though.
Which gives you billionaires who have the power to make decisions uninterrupted by commoners.
Insults show that he has a point. Where is your counter-argument?
It's the same to people. All the interest in the latest cancer medicine, people like science. They are not anti-science, they cannot tell the difference.
How do you distinguish between those two, especially if you are not intellectual.
To me this means that something has to change so that it is enough.
Why are there daily posts against Brave but not against other browsers? Is Google more trustworthy than Brave?