throwsbooks

joined 2 years ago
[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Isn't Star Wars the franchise that really kick started the trend of bringing dead/younger versions of actors back as CGI replicas?

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, the novelization's out today! Gonna need to pick that up.

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh, 100%. They're way too rudimentary. NNs alone don't go through the sense-think-act loops that necessitates a conscious autonomous agent. One day, maybe, but again, we're at the brain matter in petri dish stage.

I agree on the concepts thing too. People learn to paint by imitating what they see around them, their favourite artists, their favourite comics and cartoons. Then, over time with practice and experimentation, these things get encoded, but there's always that influence there somewhere.

Midjourney just has the benefit of being able to learn from way more imagery in a way shorter of an amount of time and practice way faster than any living human. So like, I get why artists are scared of it, but there's definitely a fundamental misunderstanding around how these things work floating around.

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (22 children)

But, if you have an answer that actually, genuinely proves that this β€œneural” network is operating similarly to how the human brain does… then you have invalidated your original post. Because if it really is thinking like a human, NO ONE should own it.

I think this is a neat point.

The human brain is very complex. The neural networks trained on computers right now are more like collections of neurons grown together in a petri dish, rather than a full human brain. They serve one function, say, recognizing or generating an image or calculating some probability or deciding on what the next word should be in a sequence. While the brain is a huge internetwork of these smaller, more specialized neural networks.

No, neural networks don't have a database and they don't do stats. They're trained through trial and error, not aggregation. The way they work is explicitly based on a mathematical model of a biological neuron.

And when an AI is developed that's advanced enough to rival the actual human brain, then yeah, the AI rights question becomes a real thing. We're not there yet, though. Still just matter in petri dishes. That's a whole other controversial argument.

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Forreal. This is my first time hearing about this film... I think I'm gonna give it a whirl.

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I was at Walmart the other day and there were four employees standing around the self checkout. They all said bye to me when I left. Weird shit.

At that point, why not just have them work the tills??

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ugh you're right. I admit I've scrolled through AITA more often than I should, because something about it is really entertaining.

But it's like junk food, I don't really feel good when I'm done with it. More vindictive, like those revenge subs. Being off Reddit has reduced how much I see it, and I don't particularly want to go back to that.

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I always thought i for index when iterating through an array. Then you can't use i again in a nested loop so j follows.

Tho sometimes x, y if the array represents coordinates.

Only a maniac would use a, b.

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Just tried it. "An oonique"... Sounds fancy.

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

NovelAI doesn't censor itself. Do with that as you will.

view more: next β€Ί