I'm just going off the information that my health care provider gave me. She said they only use it on high risk individuals because it's not as effective as claimed.
thepianistfroggollum
joined 2 years ago
That's how the courts work, though. A higher court won't weigh in unless the case is appealed from a lower court. Also, the SC's job isn't to enforce their rulings.
No, cities have insurance for this kind of thing. The premiums might go up, but the tax payer isn't footing the whole bill.
They already exist.
They're meaning something more along the lines of an ASIC. A board specifically engineered for AI/ML.
Yup. Nvidia can't make em fast enough to keep up with demand.
Maybe open source LLMs aren't up to the task, but proprietary ones certainly are.
Also, you wouldn't really need a LLM, just a FM that you fine tune for your specific purpose.
Programming AI is actually super easy, unless you decided to create your own foundation model. Even then, you would have data scientists building it, not devs.
Plenty of FMs and LLMs already exist that would be up to the task.
AI dedicated boards already exist, and Nvidia can't produce them fast enough to keep up with demand.
Source: A senior AI engineer at AWS told me.
I mean, yeah. That's how it works. No one is going to sign a contract that's guaranteed to lose them money.
Just because it worked for you doesn't mean that the effectiveness in their trials represents real world numbers. I'm not pulling this out of my ass, I was told this by a medical professional.