We really need a constitutional amendment at this point, but good luck getting enough states to agree on anything.
thepianistfroggollum
joined 2 years ago
It's the internet, so I'm not sure why anyone would be surprised.
Ah, I should have known you'd argue in bad faith.
Yup. It sounds hot as hell in theory, but in practice it's always a regrettable choice.
What's best is shower foreplay that moves to the bedroom.
I'd personally go with a hand crank cross bow or even a compound bow if I got to pick a modern weapon.
Because their training is a few weeks long and it's mostly centered around training them that everyone is trying to kill them.
They're doing exactly what they were trained to do.
Not realistically, no. Good Samaritan laws exist, and if you do CPR properly there's a 0% chance that it wouldn't be clearly obvious.
When you do CPR right, you will break ribs off the sternum (unless it's a child).
I am quite positive that I'm not.
Thank you, that's an important point to make. There's this belief that big samples are more relevant than small samples, but that is far from the truth.
The methodology is what's vital to the data's significance.
I would like to make you aware of the fact that with very little practice it takes around 1 second to change a magazine, and you can carry as many as you want.
It's like banning bump stocks. You can get the same effect with a pencil, so it's just a theatrical ban instead of something that actually helps.
This is all ignoring the fact that someone who is willing to commit mass murder is highly unlikely to care that extended magazines are illegal.
I once had a dream where I was driving down main street in a canoe. A duck popped out of nowhere, and I hit it. The duck promptly exploded and started raining minnows.
I distinctly remember waking up and thinking, "Analyze that shit, Freud"
Nah, low income housing would piss him off more.
Or, better yet, turn it into a multi-cultural heritage center.