thepianistfroggollum

No, murder is the premeditated and intentional killing of another person. Killing someone isn't automatically murder.

That was overturned in 69. The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).[1]

If things are orderly then they're predictable.

Did she do it a second time?

Yelling fire in a crowded theater has been protected speech since the 60s

The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).[1]

Yelling fire in a crowded theater has been protected speech for decades now.

I mean, if there's not enough power left over to power the safety systems, then it's an engineering failure, not operator error.

It's definitely not a false equivalency. The death rate per capita is one way you compare how deadly a mode of transportation is.

It's really only one death since 3 idiots weren't wearing helmets.

Not willful ignorance, just a low effort troll

No, he shot a very large stranger that came up behind him and started aggressively shoving their phone at his head abs kept following him as he backed away. It's completely reasonable to feel threatened in that situation.

You clearly don't know what the word murder means.