Well, it only gives a bigger reason for other search engines to index the competition.
themurphy
Doesn't really matter what you write in. The higher the % is for votes on non of the candidates, the more likely is the change.
We are basically training their models/bots for them.
It's just an excuse.
They will be hard to deal with, but for the first time ever, they need to learn compromise.
It also opens up for legitimate third part candidates in next Senate election.
Can't you vote for anyone else then?
When being a decent human being comes in the way of voting Republican.
More like it shows dangers of using only one provider for almost all IT infrastructure.
Yeah, and if that's the case, it seems like people just hate AI for the sake of it now.
LLM's are actually good at some things. Just not everything.
Closing accounts also means losing users. If the number is high enough, they want enforcement rather than banning.
It's always profits in the end.
I don't think I get what you mean, when I only named consumer rights against companies and eco friendly laws?
Can you specify why it's bad and who the EU is trying to hurt with this?
That's true, but it's also true that China has prioritised to make automated factories and investing heavily in just plain better battery tech.
I know alot of the money came from the CCP, but when the investments are done, this new tech will outperform other companies on just being better (thinking of EV specifically).
I think I'm just saying that a state investing in tech and technologies is not a bad idea always.
Iran and Turkey would be a better place, that's for sure. Especially Iran was a free country, women rights and everything. Now priests control the country, and women are getting killed for not wearing their clothing "correct".
Also, the whole western world entered the "dark ages" which was a big push backwards in terms of living standards and science. That was because of religion, so we might be 100-200 years ahead now, if it wasn't for that.