Vermont has several towns with as little as a thousand people that have fiber internet thanks to municipal cooperatives like ECFiber. Much of the state is a connectivity wasteland but it's really cool to see some towns working together to sort it out.
Thanks! It means so much when people take the time. And if the calendar does ever come to be, I will promptly announce my candidacy for pontifex maximus ;)
Yeah, me too. Here's how I think about it, though: The French are famously proud of Paris. They love it. The French government also knows that if they push their citizens too hard, they will burn Paris to the ground. This is, surprisingly, very healthy, and has allowed the French to resist the neoliberalization that has swept the rest of the west much more successfully. Meanwhile, Americans would never do such a thing, so we don't get healthcare, pensions, vacation days, etc. Tech companies are insufficiently afraid of their users. They should know that we'll burn down the internet should they displease us. We might end up losing a few valuable things in the short term, but in the long term, we'll have a much healthier relationship.
It's always easy to imagine why things won't work, then decide to do nothing. Sometimes just getting your opponent to respond opens new opportunities, while predicting failure such that you don't bother is a guaranteed path to defeat.
Also, just because they kept previous revisions doesn't necessarily make it pointless, because they'd still be using the edit in the training data. And yes, they can probably figure out how to clean that up, but then let's make them do that and see what happens.
edit: Most importantly, shit posting is fun.
I will always upvote Astra Taylor, and everyone with debt should join the Debt Collective!
I'm suspicious of this concept of editorial independence. I think it's a smoke screen that lets companies have their cake and eat it too. As far as I'm concerned, whoever cashes the checks also gets the blame, because either ownership means something, in which case the concept exists to obfuscate that, or it doesn't, in which case why is nature buying up other journals?
I cannot handle the fucking irony of that article being on nature, one of the organizations most responsible for fucking it up in the first place. Nature is a peer-reviewed journal that charges people thousands upon thousands of dollars to publish (that's right, charges, not pays), asks peer reviewers to volunteer their time, and then charges the very institutions that produced the knowledge exorbitant rents to access it. It's all upside. Because they're the most prestigious journal (or maybe one of two or three), they can charge rent on that prestige, then leverage it to buy and start other subsidiary journals. Now they have this beast of an academic publishing empire that is a complete fucking mess.
We need to set aside our petty differences and fight the true enemy: bloated IDEs.
I made a facebook for the first time last year because facebook marketplace killed craigslist where I live. If I want to buy something second hand, I basically have no choice but to use facebook, and I live on a small farm, so I'm always buying/selling some piece of equipment.