thejml

joined 2 years ago
[–] thejml@lemm.ee 62 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Oh man, This would have been awesome to Show the MAGAs how much their guys regime was costing them!

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“Art of the Deal”…

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

As someone who lives in America, I don’t understand how anyone DOES NOT think it’s offensive and threatening and a horrible stance for a president to have. But the ones that don’t think it’s a big deal is how we got where we are and I’m disappointed in my country… again.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’ve read about this phenomenon in the past. Generally it’s found that due to audio processing cost and the sheer amount of other data easily gathered, there’s no reason for them to snoop with your microphone because other data is so readily available, much easier to process, store and ship.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

The one near me is a 5min ride away. I could walk, but that wouldn’t make a difference in going. The parking lot is huge, I see no negative to driving… even if it was 20-30min away.

It’s the content, price, and experience that tends to keep me at my walking distance home theater with 11.2 Dolby Atmos and OLED. Even when it was only 5.1 it was still a better option most of the time. And I can relax, kick back, have a beer, curl up under a blanket, pause to deposit used beer, etc.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

No company will stop attempting to achieve mega corp status in a capitalist environment. Gotta make that line go up and to the right!

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But do people like “her” content? Like, I’ll be honest, radio mid day to me is very much a “spin some hits and good jams and don’t talk over everything or interrupt” kind of thing. I don’t want a DJ talking over or between tracks other than the occasional mention of what the song was. A number of stations I’ve frequented in the past were literally just a DJ’s playlist with ads interjecting every so often.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 81 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Or we could, you know, NOT do that. That’d be the better option.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Remember, If you hide it in your toilet tank, it’ll help you save water per flush as well!

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It’s actually pretty depressing how little money it takes to buy a senator. We’re talking hundreds to single digit thousands of dollars. Not really going to set that off, sadly.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

You could still put them in a stall though.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I’ve often wondered this very thing. Minus Urinals (which, do we really need them?), a toilet is pretty standard, they’re all in individual closets with doors, and no one is swinging their tits or cock around outside the stall…

That said I’m not sure what they’re thinking here anyway… they want a biological male, but post-op trans woman on HRT hanging out in the men’s room. How’s that gonna work out any different than just having ungendered rooms in the first place? What is even the goal besides “shaming” the trans person? How does that help ANYONE? They’re not going to stop being trans because of it. And who is going to check or care?

As a dude in a bathroom stall, I don’t care who’s shitting next to me as long as the door is closed and they clean up after themselves.

view more: ‹ prev next ›