thedarkfly

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 3 points 11 months ago

That's pretty nice, it's basically additional leave days! I still prefer European style with unlimited sick leave, but you need a certificate from your physician.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Without a doubt! Humans and life in general is uber efficient in terms of energy use. Most of the energy of a car is not directly spent for the work. Work is done when moving mass from a lower to a higher place and accelerating it to a higher speed. But once you have accelerated the mass to the cruise speed, it actually does not require any energy to maintain. Rather, the energy is spent by the car to heat up the air, move it around, wear the road and the tires, and make noise.

We use cars because they are muuuch more powerful than humans, at the cost of wasing a lot of energy. Try to push a car uphill, you won't ever succeed without pullies which makes it even slower. Doesn't matter how efficient you are if you cannot output the minimum power required to overcome friction etc.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Police unions are not always a force for good, specifically they can lack solidarity with other workers. In France they lobbied to keep their privilege while the retirement age was increased for everyone else.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Okay, I had a listen. Basically his arguments are:

  • People don't want it, it is forced through ruse by socialist politicians.
  • It removes freedom from patients to choose their insurance, health care provider etc.
  • It removes freedom from physicians to choose their working methods and living/practicing location. The state will control every aspect of their profession.
  • By slippery slope, it's going to lead to the same for every profession.

So it's an attack point to impose socialism in America. Eh.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Somebody listened to this and can tell me what his rationale was? The unspoken reason is probably like less taxation for the rich and profit in the medical industry, but what are the "sensible" arguments he would be brave enough to formulate in public at the time? If it's about medical research and innovation, it could be assured by the government but "it's not the job of the state to ensure the people's well-being"? Or "people will get lazy if their health is not on the line"?

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In Belgium, we have the same thing. The explanation is that the highest point of the country is at 694 m, so they built 6 m of stairs to reach 700 m.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah that's what I'm guessing.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Where's the rabbit though?

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I guess it's a black beach towel with white grid half buried in the sand?

E: nah, looks more like actual tiles 🤔

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Some people use quotes for emphasis, though. So, not sure if this faculty's on our side.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 18 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I'd argue it's the only correct thing though. Sure, it's through reflection, but reflection is absorption and re-emission so the light really comes from the moon.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the stuff in the background on the right?

view more: ‹ prev next ›