theacharnian

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Future generations treating past generations with disdain is kind of the whole point of social progress. Slavery has only been a social taboo in the last couple centuries max. Women's equal political rights are even more recent, only about 100 years. LGBT rights are barely a generation old. So wtf is this argument? It's logical extension is "infant exposure is OK, the Romans did it just fine"

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

But the EU is not actually contending anything.

Anyway, cheers.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Like I said, not a lost cause. But I'm pessimistic based on what I'm seeing European politicians actually doing.

That said, I am not sure I buy the "beat chance" rhetoric, that's too Fukuyama-ist for my taste. History didn't end.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

The EU has to earn its reputation as a champion of human rights and international law back. So far I haven't seen any movement towards that. It's not a lost cause yet but I am not optimistic.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lost third spaces, hanging out with other kids and helicopter parenting/stranger danger.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

Cool, so be super responsible on their part instead. If they can't be trusted to save up themselves, do the saving up of all the money yourself, o wise conservative. And let's put all that money in a trust fund for them and just give them the dividends. Let's call those dividends a "Universal Basic Dividend".

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (9 children)

That's just tankie campism upside down.

In my post I literally take the side of the Hague Group. International law, UN courts, the Rome Statute, the rules based international order.

You want to push the West to be better? Take that side.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are we still talking about rural and periurban Ireland?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 days ago

I don't appreciate using the environment as a cudgel to entrench the expendability of human lives in the altar of the fast car.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Ooooo urban people and their weird "don't kill pedestrians" ideas.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago (11 children)

I know right? I choose the Hague Group.

Oh wait what, you meant the genocide enabling Trump-led block?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Military vet" with a picture of a horse, I thought it was a veterinarian at first 🤷

 

Leading economists endorse Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral plan to freeze rents, expand free buses, and launch public grocery stores.

 

Comment: this is what actual argumentation for increased military spending looks like, not the cheap shots and smears of being propaganda vectors levelled against dissident points of view like those of Sanchez or Varoufakis. Europe deserves better than paranoia and McCarthyism.

 

Former Israeli peace negotiator Daniel Levy on what's driving Netanyahu and why this will be a defining moment for Trump's MAGA movement.

 

The House of Representatives is trying to pass a resolution making the term “Free Palestine” an official antisemitic slogan.

Republican Representative Gabe Evans from Colorado introduced the resolution in the wake of the attack on a gathering for Israeli hostages in Boulder this week. Mohammed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been charged for the attack, during which he yelled “Free Palestine,” according to the FBI.

“Whereas, while shouting ‘Free Palestine,’ an antisemitic slogan that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel and Jewish people, Mohammed Sabry Soliman attacked the peaceful demonstrators with homemade Molotov cocktails,” the resolution reads. House Republicans are expected to vote on the nonbinding resolution next week.

 

Paul Buitink talks to former Greek Minister of Finance (2015) and author of several books like 'Technofeudalism, What Killed Capitalism' about the risks of modern technofeudalism in which cloud capitalists extract rents from the public and distort public discourse. He says we need to tax big tech to the hilt since privatizing wouldn't work. Also he proposes how cities should create their own tech alternatives.

The gentlemen also talk about the euro, why Bulgaria shouldn't join and Greece should exit. The Netherlands should perhaps try to reform it or join a union with other hard currency countries. Yanis would like to federalize the EU but realizes it's maybe time to dismantle it. Also he laments Europe's military Keynesianism and thinks it's not wise to spend all that money on defense. The EU has taken the wrong turn and each path since 2014 when it comes to the war in Ukraine Yanis believes.

view more: ‹ prev next ›