tfm

joined 5 months ago
MODERATOR OF
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5823642

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ukrainianconflict by /u/rezwenn on 2025-05-14 12:21:07+00:00.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29751773

I'm not European, so I can't sign (I think), sharing this is the most I can do; but if you and/or someone you know is from Europe and hasn't signed yet Please do!

EDIT: THE THRESHOLD HAS BEEN REACHED!!! LETS FUCKING GOOOOO!!!

22
WHERMST (infosec.pub)
 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/post/6029039

 
 
 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/64026427

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 5 months ago

Not that I like it. It's just how it is.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

That may be true technologically. But if the economics don't add up it's a bubble.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 5 months ago

Why do you assume the developer has to implement what could be paid for?

If 80% of your income comes from a single company that pays you to develop the features they want, can you afford to decline specific requests without risking that client? Probably not. Without income diversification, you can quickly end up in a situation where your client dictates your work.

Why is the assumption that devs will give up agency?

Because financial dependence limits choice. When a developer relies on just a few clients, those clients gain leverage over them, making it difficult to turn down requests, even if they’d prefer to.

And why the assumption that all paid requests will be by corporations?

Because private individuals rarely spend hundreds or thousands of dollars to get a feature implemented. A more realistic approach for individual users would be crowdfunding or pooling resources to fund specific features.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Then corporations will decide even more where open source projects are going. If you pay me you decide where the project is going, not me.

However, if core development is unrelated to my income, I have full control over it's fate and don't need to implement what's in the interest of some shitty corporation.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 16 points 5 months ago

When the image of "Nicole" is loaded, your computer/phone connects to another server and transfers your IP address. But it currently looks like it's not that big of a problem. Still a fix will be implemented soon to prevent this.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 2 points 5 months ago

This would break a lot of sites

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 5 months ago

Thanks! Completely overlooked that

[–] tfm@europe.pub 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think it's some powder you mix with water and heat up.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Hmm do you have a link to docs for that? 🤔

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

But shouldn't this depend on the receiving end? I have enabled it and it still used the direct link

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Only if it's for Client specific Extensions not the core project. Basically freelance work. Paid bug fixes and feature requests to core are a big no-go.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 2 points 5 months ago

That's the big question. But it looks intentional.

view more: ‹ prev next ›