tetris11

joined 2 years ago
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

someone in that HOA has shares in a trash bag fastening company, guarantee it

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

in the UK, you buy a house and you pay a council (county?) tax. If you collect junk outside of your house no one says anything, you just get assigned as a cooky neighbour.

If the rats come or its genuinely bringing down the safety of the area, neighbours might complain tothe council who may/may not do anything about it depending on how much they care. Council positions are safe/steady jobs but the pay isn't great, so you can expect swift inaction at any time.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

"For the last time Jim, dang and heck are not real swearwords, so you don't need to keep feeding the jar money."

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

something something broken arms

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Be careful where you drop your pick, by Vectron!

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh I know, I just wanted an excuse to call someone a butthole

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it shouldn't, should it? Switch an ICE for electric, as long as they travel the same daily distance and meet the same use cases, the only lifestyle change would be the expense.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

This is high level trolling, very impressive sir

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm actually lost here, butthole?

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you make a city hostile to cars first, people will still have their cars and their commutes, it will just double the time it takes for them to get anywhere. You will lose support for any further changes.

If you replace the cars first, such that no one's daily schedules are significantly altered, and then condense the cities, then the change might be less jarring for those who can't weather dramatic changes in their lifestyle.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, but Hollywood doesn't want to grow an IP, it wants fast quick money now, and if peddling fart jokes is all it takes to separate overwhelmed parents from their cash, then they'll do it

view more: ‹ prev next ›