It's just the internet plus some weighted dice. Nothing to be afraid of.
Sure, these grifters are shady AF about their wacky definition of "reason"... But that's just a continuation of the entire "AI" grift.
This would be a much better paper if it addressed that question in an honest way.
Instead they just parrot the misleading terminology that they're supposedly debunking.
How dat collegial boys club undermines science...
There's probably alot of misunderstanding because these grifters intentionally use misleading language: AI, reasoning, etc.
If they stuck to scientifically descriptive terms, it would be much more clear and much less sensational.
Yeah I often think about this Rick N Morty cartoon. Grifters are like, "We made an AI ankle!!!" And I'm like, "That's not actually something that people with busted ankles want. They just want to walk. No need for a sentient ankle." It's a real gross distortion of science how everything needs to be "AI" nowadays.
It's hard to to be heard when you're buried under all that sweet VC/grant money.
Peak pseudo-science. The burden of evidence is on the grifters who claim "reason". But neither side has any objective definition of what "reason" means. It's pseudo-science against pseudo-science in a fierce battle.
Wait until you find out the entire history of usa...
This will not be covered by the MSM.
Imagine if a cop was rubber bulleted tho. It would be even more endless copaganda...
What dat fascist culture do.
Cars are horses. How do you feel about statement?