technocrit

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Have you been in a coma for the past couple months?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Still a capitalist shill, eh?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"And then they can for the white 'science' bros... but there was no left to speak up..."

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 6 months ago

Not to mention the nazi scientists... Nobody wants to talk about them...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not like ICE has a plan, a clue, a reason... They're just trying to attack as many people as their daddy commands.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 6 months ago

B/c these people are just libs.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I can't wait for these brave visionaries to build capitalism and white supremacy in Europe. \s

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago

See my reply for what I think they're talking about. 100 vs 10 in article.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The article says both:

the first year of a scheme in Wales where the speed limit on urban roads was lowered to 20mph resulted in about 100 fewer people killed or seriously injured.

and then later...

While Welsh government statisticians warn that at least three years’ data will be needed for a meaningful conclusion, the road casualty figures – showing an estimated 10 fewer deaths and a nearly one-third drop in overall casualties – follow research from insurers indicating that 20mph zones appear to be bringing down the number of claims.

There's a citation for the first number 100 but the citation for the second number doesn't say anything about 10 people.

So it seems like 100 might be the more accurate number. I wouldn't blame OP. Sloppy article.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Probably never. Land is a very finite resource violently controlled by a smaller and smaller group of people. There's no reason for them to dump their holdings. People literally need land to survive. It's the ultimate and original capitalist cash cow. It's a fundamental pyramid scheme on human needs along with food, water, air, etc. That's a very solid foundation in a fascist police state.

view more: ‹ prev next ›