technocrit

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

Nice. Ban cars! Big win for humanity and the planet.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Always has been.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

Diddy tales

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

Independence of lawyers? Their entire existence relies on the state.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Meh. Is there anyone who has kept perfect OpSec for their whole life?

I've been trying but, under national scrutiny, I'm sure I must have leaked personal data everywhere.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

I tried HackerNews ,

lmao. Don't.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'll take whatever wins I can get.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

Nice. Ban cars!!! Big win for humanity and the planet.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Are they going to block the sale of land stolen through genocide?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'm crypto-neutral and quantum-skeptical but this seems like a legit threat.

The other major cryptos have moved to a proof-of-stake which is more centralized, but also more flexible. For example I can easily imagine ETH upgrading to post-quantum cryptography.

But Bitcoin is much less flexible. It has never evolved past proof-of-work. It's much harder for me to imagine a unified upgrade for post-quantum BTC.

view more: ‹ prev next ›