technocrit

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago

Imagine what the dems would do.... Nothing.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I’ve never met a person who has anything against Wikipedia.

You probably hang out with too many lames.

As this post explains, wikipedia has been doxing its own editors since inception. Beyond that people who use VPNs are blocked. Beyond that the founder is a fash. Beyond that the editors are a closed group of insiders consistently promoting hegemonic narratives. Beyond that many pages are just corporate/state propaganda...

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 4 months ago

It's not an open website at all. It severely privileges hegemonic editors promoting the status quo. Thus it's actually a right-wing website.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 months ago

TL;DR: Wikipedia has been doxing its own editors since inception.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Does Heritage dox its own people too?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 4 months ago

Wikipedia has been doxing its own editors for decades. The Heritage Foundation is just threatening to use this public information... It's a hegemonic team working together to maintain the narrative.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also Wikipedia is a s politically unbiased as it can be. Every artivle presents just facts and no opinions or emotions.

lmao. Half of the articles are corporate propaganda and the rest are CIA.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It's defensible because it's public record. Wikipedia has been doxing editors by default for decades. It's one way that they intimidate people from making edits.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wikipedia has dox'd "anonymous" editors by default for its entire existence.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wikipedia is too liberal.

Yes, wikipedia is right-wing. It reproduces hegemonic narratives that serve the status quo. That's the point of them doxing anonymous editors by default for the past couple decades.

view more: ‹ prev next ›