However, there is a huge energy cost for that speed to process statistically the information to mimic intelligence. The human brain is consuming much less energy. Also, AI will be fine with well defined task where innovation isn't a requirement. As it is today, AI is incapable to innovate.
tartarin
joined 1 month ago
Not only the environment, the overall Americans health too. Each year, 700 000 Americans are dying from heart diseases.
I think the Pakistani Defence Minister summarized it nicely.
They provide "independent advice" apparently, what a circus!
In summary: "I have no fucking idea what I'm doing."
Where is the list of reasons he deserves kicks in the ass?
I tried to say that once on Reddit, it didn't turn well.
I'm banned from Reddit and since the appeal process is bullshit, I didn't bother to appeal.
That's why it's not brute force anymore.
I'm perfectly aware anything can be brute forced and that's why it doesn't worth to mention. Now, the amount of resources required to brute force a hashed password has nothing to do with the complexity of the password. No matter what the password is, the hash will have a fixed length and appear as a random sequence of bytes. Otherwise you are not doing it properly.
The complexity of the password has something to do with guessing the password from dictionary or known most common passwords.
Your brain is running on sugar. Do you take into account the energy spent in coal mining, oil fields exploration, refinery, transportation, electricity transmission loss when computing the amount of energy required to build and run AI? Do you take into account all the energy consumption for the knowledge production in first place to train your model? Running the brain alone is much less energy intensive than running an AI model. And the brain can create actual new content/knowledge. There is nothing like the brain. AI excel at processing large amount of data, which the brain is not made for.