takeda

joined 2 months ago
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, AI (not LLM) can be a very useful tool in doing research, but this takes about deciding if a drug should be approved or not.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Well some progressives managed to snook in. We need more.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well at least we know there's no UFO or aliens as we would see tons of it declassified right now.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Vote in primaries, run for office.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What do you expect? Disable console first, then put things in EULA?

Why put something like this in EULA if there's no intention of doing it, especially as they didn't put it for EU where such practice is outright illegal?

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The "legalese" explicitly stated in clear words that they have right to brick your device. If they had no intention of doing it they wouldn't put that in.

This was added so once they brick it they can argue in court that you agreed to this when purchased your switch.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Before it happens they put it in EULA which they did.

You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part.

It couldn't be any clearer.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It is not like "slaughter" is any nicer word than "genocide". I would argue that slaughter sounds much worse to an average person.

Genocide is what Netanyahu is doing, and slaughter is how.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they going to brick the console they better refund the money.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

The thing is that you normally don't release details of pending investigation, but trump and Republicans were riding on this promise and now that they actually have the power they looking for excuses "files don't exist", "files were created by Democrats", "why you even talk about files?"

It is clear that trump doesn't care about integrity of the investigation (given that people involved in it were fired I think effectively it is stopped) but that he is in those files.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 weeks ago

Because you don't publish details of investigation. You publish indictments once investigation is done. That's essentially weaponization of DOJ.

Republicans were promising to release (and suggesting Democrats are on it). Now as they have the power, they refuse. Claim the files don't exist then that they are fake, then they are boring.

At this point it is very clear that trump is in them.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalism no doubt sucks, but our other inventions suck even more unfortunately.

view more: ‹ prev next ›