swlabr

joined 2 years ago
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

guess I need my brain re-wrinkled

Nah, just wrinkled.

And what elements of EA makes it a political framework rather than a moral one?

Even if it were possible, it’s not my job to educate you.

saving lives through charity, not the distribution of power, resources and privilege within a society or communal framework.

My stars! Good job googling “political framework”! You seem to be under the impression that charities are a black box that do nothing other than save lives. Perhaps you should look into that.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

EA is absolutely a political framework. You're just too lazy or smooth-brained to see it.

Usually that doesn’t involve compelling you to perform that action by any other means than appealing to your desire to be moral.

You... don't know what a moral framework is.

It for sure is morally good to spend any extra money you have in a way that does the most good, billionaire or not.

"Duuuuuuuh it's good to do thing that do most good duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh" <- that's you

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

Nah, it doesn't. Utilitarianism is pretty useless; in this case, it's pretty fucking clear that the IDF are utility monsters. And what do you mean by "basic universalism"?

response to your edit: that is not an unequivocal denouncement of genocide lol. That's some weaselly shit where Singer is trying his best not to say what is obviously true (genocide bad) and instead try and say "these are ways in which Israel can continue to justify genocide."

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

found on reddit. posted without further comment

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The saying “there is no such thing as an ethical billionaire” springs to mind. Who did they, or their families fuck over, in order to garner that sort of wealth?

There’s a running joke/working theory I’ve heard that in order to become billionaire, you have to have killed someone. (The reality is almost definitely worse)

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

yeah, so we agree, EA, which is predicated on the wealthy actually giving away their money, is a flawed concept as that is something the wealthy cannot be compelled to do without force

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Nah dawg it’s the fact that his “incredible solid and well argued” moral framework finds it impossible to unequivocally denounce a fucking genocide that means that maybe it’s not nearly as solid as you say.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 3 weeks ago

Not sure on that but I think he’s related to Sabrina Carpenter. Source, this line from Espresso:

I'm working late, 'cause I'm a Singer

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 14 points 3 weeks ago

mating pool

probably on par with the other stuff you might see at a rationalist poly compound

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 15 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

It’s almost as if the wealthy by and large don’t actually care about doing good or improving society!!!

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 14 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

It’s somewhat non-trivial to create a billionaire, let alone an EA variant; what other ideas do you have for improving EA?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 14 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

who is this peter singer fellow? Sounds like a great and unproblematic man. Please tell us more of his teachings.

view more: ‹ prev next ›