swlabr

joined 2 years ago
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 15 points 5 days ago

that's what happens if your computer is a von Meowmann architecture machine

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 15 points 5 days ago

tangential: reminds me of this stupid thing that I saw like 10 years ago that I have recreated for y'alls viewing pleasure. Feel free to insert whatever narrative you like as to how I encountered the image on the left.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Another Oglaf reference???

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

this is great, but now I'm sad

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 1 week ago

somewhere out there, there's a writer who really likes the em dash, the word "delve," and answering questions with a one-word hyper-chipper affirmative, followed by three sentences of people pleasing. He can't get a job because he keeps being accused of using AI

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zima Blue

Didn’t know it was something readable! I just know it as an episode of Love Death + Robots. It was a standout episode in an otherwise pretty boring first two seasons.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

kinda related but wouldn’t it be fun to believe that LLMs were invented by Big Em Dash as a conspiracy

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ok so in arabic it’s exactly how this guy wants it

reminded me of this

text of image/tweet@amasad. Apr 22

Silicon Valley will rediscover Islam:

  • fasting for clarity and focus
  • mindfulness 5 times a day
  • no alcohol that ruins the soul & body
  • long-term faithful relationships for a fulfilling happy family life
  • effective altruism by giving zakat directly to the poor
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Gonna take a wild guess that enough people have tried this joke to the point where they've added custom code or lines in the system prompt about it:

prompt and outpoo

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 17 points 1 week ago (6 children)

with like 15 links for context/back references, this is basically impenetrable. splendid find

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Fortunately, we do not work in physical proximity!

 

Abstracted abstract:

Frontier models are increasingly trained and deployed as autonomous agents, which significantly increases their potential for risks. One particular safety concern is that AI agents might covertly pursue misaligned goals, hiding their true capabilities and objectives – also known as scheming. We study whether models have the capability to scheme in pursuit of a goal that we provide in-context and instruct the model to strongly follow. We evaluate frontier models on a suite of six agentic evaluations where models are instructed to pursue goals and are placed in environments that incentivize scheming.

I saw this posted here a moment ago and reported it*, and it looks to have been purged. I am reposting it to allow us to sneer at it.

*

 

Didn’t see this news posted but please link previous correspondence if I missed it.

https://archive.is/XwbY0

 

This is somewhat tangential to the usual fare here but I decided to make a post because why not.

I’ve been listening to the back catalog of the Judge John Hodgman podcast, and this ep came up. This ep is the second crypto based case after “crypto facto” in ep 333.

John Hodgman is a comedian, probs best known for being the “I’m a PC” guy in the “I’m a Mac” ad campaign from ancient times. In the podcast, he plays a fake judge that hears cases and makes judgements. In this ep, “Suing for Soul Custody,” he hears a case in which a husband wants to sell his soul on the blockchain, while his wife does not want him to do that.

Some good sneers against the crypto bro husband (in both this case and the other I linked). Brief spoilers as to the rulings in case you don’t want to listen:

333Judge rules that the husband should continue to mine ETH until his rig burns down his house.

556Judge rules that the guy shouldn’t sell his soul, for symbolic reasons.

Note: I like John Hodgman. He’s funny. He’s not really inside the tech space, but he is good friends with Jonathan Coulton, who is. If all you know of him is the “I’m a PC” ads, he has an entertaining wider catalogue worth checking out.

 

On the hottest and coldest days, when demand for electricity peaks and the price rockets, the bitcoin miners either sell power back to providers at a profit or stop mining for a fee, paid by ercot. Doing so has become more lucrative than mining itself. In August of 2023 Riot collected $32m from curtailing mining and just $8.6m from selling bitcoin.

Archive link: https://archive.md/O8Cz9

 

Kind of sharing this because the headline is a little sensationalist and makes it sound like MS is hard right (they are, but not like this) and anti-EU.

I mean, they probably are! Especially if it means MS is barred from monopolies and vertical integration.

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by swlabr@awful.systems to c/meta@awful.systems
 

Wish I had a screengrab of this, but occasionally when I open the awful.systems page, it looks like I've logged in as a different user. Just now the username "autumnal" appeared instead of my own. Don't know how to reproduce.

This has happened in chrome on macosx a few times, haven't seen it elsewhere.

22
VoughtCoin (the-boys.fandom.com)
 

TIL that television program “The Boys” has an in universe cryptocurrency as a satire of, well, cryptocurrency in general but also specifically that time when DJT was selling NFTs. They occasionally tweet about it.

It has a listing on the “BSCScan” crypto tracker under the name “VTC” so someone might have actually minted it? It might surprise some of you that I have no way of telling the realness of such a thing.

 

Uncritically sharing this article with naive hope. Is this just PR for a game? Probably. Indies deserve as much free press as possible though.

 

As is tradition I am sharing this link without having listened yet.

 

The video game in question:

view more: ‹ prev next ›